Video Game Forums

Go Back   Video Game Forums > Miscellaneous > Older Threads

Older Threads This is where most of our older threads are located. These threads can still be replied to.


Range Rant
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2006   #71
 
Jcbiker's Avatar


 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Watford, UK (near london)
Age: 18
Posts: 133

Send a message via AIM to Jcbiker Send a message via MSN to Jcbiker
Ok, i read the first few pages... i'm in the UK, so havn't got all the patches and shiz you guys do, but over here, you cant kill with an m16 at more than 120m, i've put a whole clip of headshots into a sniper at 124m, and hes' not died.

An Idub, suppressed, i can get body kills at around 100m with like 4 shots.

An SASR/SR-25, i find my self CONSTANTLY out of range if its suppressed. Being i've never used these unsuppressed (the only reason i use them is for stealth) i cannot comment as to weather this is due to the supp.

I've ALWAYS got a kill from a headshot with a 50. cal, I cannot remember ONE time, a 50. cal hasn't killed from a head shot, yes, its been laggy, i've shot him, hes stayed there, 2 secs later, head covered in blood, body rolls over.

As to THIS:

Quote:
Originally Posted by babygushue
Way off topic, maybe if your parents went out and medicated you for your ADD problem would you be able to read the first three threads. Untill then your post is irrelevant.
Baby Gushu, Stop bringing mental illness into this, your lifes a fu<king joke, you fu<king Pri<k.

If someone has a different opinion to you, it does not mean they have ADD, or mean that theyre parents/carers did/do not medicate them for it.

What i quoted from you is WAY over the line of flaming, it personal. (yes, i know the life thing was personal, but you need shutting up)

As far as i know, no gun has infinate range, a L96 will always hit (if on target) at any range i've found, but not always kill.

A .50cal, will always kill from a head shot, if it hits, due to it not being 100% accurate at long range.

It doesn't matter about range, its accuracy at range thats the key.

EDIT: I've never had any recoil in scope with an m16, in any scope, at any magnification.

Maybe just lag?
__________________
[SoCoM3 HaNdLe - jcbiker] [Clan: [S*F] - Socoms*Finest]

[
Catch Me Playin Respawns On The European Servers]

Last edited by Jcbiker; 07-23-2006 at 09:49 AM.
Jcbiker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2006   #72


 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 43

Coming from a guy who puts scopes on his assault rifles, and loves sniping with them, I love the rnages. I've been killing people with silenced STG's from across Devil's Road. LMAO
__________________
What were you expecting to see here, a signature?
The7InchPianist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006   #73


 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25

Answer 2 the M16

Take my word for fact. I have thousand of assault rifle kills and more then 89% of them are m16 related.


The M16 does not, i repeat does NOT recoil in any scope, as long as you are in crouch or prone. If using the m16 standing it will recoil.

However if the m16 is used on single shot standing it will not recoil unless you fire very very rapidly.

The recoil that you guys experience in game when your prone or in crouch is because of lag. Either you or the host are having connection issues, trust me on this. I have seen the gun recoil while in crouch on burst, however this was because of lag and on single shot didnt.

Plz note that moving while in scope could also be the reason for your recoil, keep this in mind and take what i have written for fact. If you dont believe me then check my stats and check whats listed as my favorite gun.

To all of you who dont believe me , play that sweet music
Kingdx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006   #74


 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 200

Quote:
Originally Posted by SHASTINTOR

Hell, youre talking about not being able to hear it... in any situation you wouldnt hear the first shot before I planted it in your head anyway if you REALLY want to get technical... (supersonic bullets beat the sound to the target and kill before the victim even knows what hit them.)



Another thing.... your argument that the .50 caliber weapons are useless....this is truly perplexing....

Let's analyze the situation:

12x7 x 99mm (.50 caliber) rifle - 1 shot kill to the torso or head.

5.56 x 45mm (.223 caliber) M16 - 1 shot kill to the head.... 3-4 shots to the torso to kill.

Which is faster? 1 shot to the torso, or 4 shots?
Critically think.

The m16 is a three round burst, just do it reall quick and I can put 6 bullets in your torrso at the same amount of speed as a shooting a 50 cal. Why do I know this? Because I do it to people all the time, I take advantage of the new range. I am honest that it is totally cheap and worthless to have.
__________________
babygushue is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006   #75


 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 200

Quote:
Originally Posted by The7InchPianist
Coming from a guy who puts scopes on his assault rifles, and loves sniping with them, I love the rnages. I've been killing people with silenced STG's from across Devil's Road. LMAO

yeah its funny and so cheap to do aint it. I do it all the time too, Thats right laugh it up.
__________________
babygushue is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006   #76


 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 200

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jcbiker
Ok, i read the first few pages... i'm in the UK, so havn't got all the patches and shiz you guys do, but over here, you cant kill with an m16 at more than 120m, i've put a whole clip of headshots into a sniper at 124m, and hes' not died.

An Idub, suppressed, i can get body kills at around 100m with like 4 shots.

An SASR/SR-25, i find my self CONSTANTLY out of range if its suppressed. Being i've never used these unsuppressed (the only reason i use them is for stealth) i cannot comment as to weather this is due to the supp.

I've ALWAYS got a kill from a headshot with a 50. cal, I cannot remember ONE time, a 50. cal hasn't killed from a head shot, yes, its been laggy, i've shot him, hes stayed there, 2 secs later, head covered in blood, body rolls over.

As to THIS:



Baby Gushu, Stop bringing mental illness into this, your lifes a fu<king joke, you fu<king Pri<k.

If someone has a different opinion to you, it does not mean they have ADD, or mean that theyre parents/carers did/do not medicate them for it.

What i quoted from you is WAY over the line of flaming, it personal. (yes, i know the life thing was personal, but you need shutting up)

As far as i know, no gun has infinate range, a L96 will always hit (if on target) at any range i've found, but not always kill.

A .50cal, will always kill from a head shot, if it hits, due to it not being 100% accurate at long range.

It doesn't matter about range, its accuracy at range thats the key.

EDIT: I've never had any recoil in scope with an m16, in any scope, at any magnification.

Maybe just lag?

Basically you europeans are patchless and dont have this new socom 3 problem like the rest of these mindless Americans do. Thanks for the information.
__________________
babygushue is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Range Rant


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO