Video Game Forums

Go Back   Video Game Forums > Miscellaneous > Older Threads

Older Threads This is where most of our older threads are located. These threads can still be replied to.


Getting out of the negatives.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-02-2006   #11
 
dansdarkside's Avatar


 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ft Story Va, originally from NY
Posts: 1,313

Send a message via AIM to dansdarkside Send a message via MSN to dansdarkside
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phobos
I'm sick and tired of ****ing rooms without grenades.. people in the Jr. Grades are god damn panzies they never want to play with nades..

the bltchin WOW how did this go from how do u get ur rank out of the neg to people bltchin about games with no nads
__________________


I am the stone the builder refused.


Stationed at Ft. Story, 5 minutes away from VA beach, just can't beat that

Deploying to Iraq mid september 2008, will be back sept 2009
dansdarkside is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006   #12


 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 406

rank doesnt mean ****, our clan is mostly buttersticks and a few lieutentants, and we beat clans that are cookies, admirals, etc. The only admirals and cookies on our roster even admit to ranking up. So, y worry about it, if you are an admiral you just get called a "rank up"
__________________

S3slayer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006   #13


 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Halifax
Posts: 89

Send a message via MSN to ProudFighter
To get back positive you would need to have great accurcey percent, more kills then deaths all the time, no friendly kills, lots of rounds won with game wins and some luck.
__________________
ProudFighter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006   #14
Moderator
 
NUN-PUNCHER's Avatar


 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 3,994
Xbox 360 ID : TheNunPunch3r
PS3 ID : NunPuncher

Like people have said, a majority of the people playing are butter sticks, so if your shooting at them all the time your ranks isnt going anywhere. From what I understand is that shooting people of higher rank is the best way to move up in ranks. I never see enough cookies or stars to pray upon so therefore I don't care about rank. Nobody should blame themselves that their rank is going nowhere, blame poor game design.
NUN-PUNCHER is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006   #15
Moderator
 
OME6A's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by NUN-PUNCHER
Nobody should blame themselves that their rank is going nowhere, blame poor game design.
Half truth. Also blame the legions of rank up noobs that waste their lives away in escort rooms talking about how 1337 they are.

The design of Socom 3's rank system is great in theory. You are awarded points based on your performence, your team's performence, the size of the game and the players you oppose. The ranking system then calculates your total points and gives you a rating. Based on your rating score, and how it compares to every other player on Socom 3, it awards you a rank.

Because there are so many rank ups, with impossible rating scores, the ranking system is crippled. They have successfully askiewed the key formulas that determine the ranks of Socom's majority.

Thus, an evaluation system should be created to identify those who have ranked up, and all should be banned as well as everyone's ranks/stats reset.
__________________
XBL [ SvNs OME6A ] • • • • • • • • • PSN [ SvNs_OME6A ]
Thanks E!
SOTWs Won : #133, #152, #158

Last edited by OME6A; 04-03-2006 at 01:51 PM.
OME6A is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006   #16
Moderator
 
NUN-PUNCHER's Avatar


 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 3,994
Xbox 360 ID : TheNunPunch3r
PS3 ID : NunPuncher

Quote:
Originally Posted by M!KE
Half truth. Also blame the legions of rank up noobs that waste their lives away in escort rooms talking about how 1337 they are.

The design of Socom 3's rank system is great in theory. You are awarded points based on your performence, your team's performence, the size of the game and the players you oppose. The ranking system then calculates your total points and gives you a rating. Based on your rating score, and how it compares to every other player on Socom 3, it awards you a rank.

Because there are so many rank ups, with impossible rating scores, the ranking system is crippled. They have successfully askiewed the key formulas that determine the ranks of Socom's majority.

Thus, an evaluation system should be created to identify those who have ranked up, and all should be banned as well as everyone's ranks/stats reset.


As usual your posts of knowledge are Golden.......
I discounted the rank-up-retards because I'm at work and it would of required much more typing. Wonderful explaination by you Nun the less.....
NUN-PUNCHER is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2006   #17


 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mint Hill NC
Age: 33
Posts: 227

Thumbs up

I agree it's the Rank Ups that's killing our ratings. I have 169 more wins than losses and I am still in the negatives it really doesn't matter to me anymore. But I would like to see them reset all disconnects and freeze them at zero if possible. Keep all Kills and Deaths the way they are and Friends/Clan list the same. Meaning I don't want them to reset all the ranks at zero because even though there's alot of rank ups out there if they reset all disconnects your rating will be better and that will be what you have earned. Until then I will continue going from Butter Stick to Lt. Junior Grade and be happy that I will probably never get any higher unless they take all disconnects away.
Seminole Warrior is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2006   #18


 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dirty Jerzey
Posts: 51

Yes the ranking system is messed up and there is no way to stop it. I am a 100 % legitimate 3 star admiral. I only have a score of 1060 (that's only 60 more from the day i started) I do not play a lot and when I do, because of the problems with joining ranked rooms and just not wanting to deal with waiting 5 minutes for a round to start, I play in unranked respawn so I have been able to maintain my rank. I have also been lucky to not be hit with the disconnects bug (I only have 20). Not taking skill away from me, I am a very good player and I have been as low as 850 and from 850, despite the problems with disconnects I was able to rise back to 1125 before falling to 1020 and rising to 1060 after not playing a couple months. So it is possible to gain rank if you go on a good streak. However, everybody on my friends list who is ranked above a luietenant does not play the game anymore. One of my friends who is a better player then me and plays a lot was ranked with a score of 1700 100% legit. Since the reset, he has since went into the negatives simply because he plays so much and recieves so many disconnects.

So in conclusion, you cannot play this game often in ranked rooms and maintain a steady rank. Everybody around me either does not play anymore or plays unranked. Rank ups are AS serious of a problem because they only constitute less then 1 % of the entire registered players (Like the top 2000 or so) However the problem is the ranking system is so bottom heavy, rank ups take all of the 5 star admiral spots and a majority of the 4 star admiral spots. There's only about 3-5000 5 star admiral spots, where as there's more like 100,000 butter stick spots (not exact values just guesses). A ranking system should be bottom heavy, but a ranking system should allow players to increase their scores because the majority of the high ranks are people that do not play anymore. THIS is the problem with the ranking system.
__________________


DaRKSiDe eLiTe MeMBeR

Highest S2 rank: 4000

Taking OVER US EAST 33 in SOCOM 3

My bullets, coming to a teamate near you: 10/11/2k5.

Last edited by (D)aRKSiDe; 04-04-2006 at 12:23 PM.
(D)aRKSiDe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2006   #19


 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 16

Send a message via AIM to Chaos16 Send a message via Yahoo to Chaos16
I swear M!ck is one of thoese people that really have the good anwsers.................. M!ck I Honestly applaud you for your well thought out post and responces. But I do agree the premis of the system is good and I think it is mostly the rank ups fault if you took away all the rank ups our stats would be were they belong!
Chaos16 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2006   #20


 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3

Send a message via MSN to blindvital
Exclamation Hmm

Yeh i'm with the ranking system,whats up with it.Socom 2 took 3 weeks to get to lt.c and No matter how good I do,recently played the best game I ever have and went 26-6,ya for me,and my rank worsened.What the hell jingle bells?You cant win no matter what you do.The only people with high ranks anyways earned them from the transfer from enlisted cause its not possible to keep it or especially get it back up again without cheating or viagra.I know cause we had Lt.'s in our clan and now there butter sticks going under and we are all good players,so get a new credit card play the enlisted ranks well,then never play a rank game again.Otherwise ya have fun as a butter stick for your whole existance.lmao its not so bad pretty soon there wont be anything high than buttersticks,**** look at the flag grade rooms and you tell me just according to how many people play them hahaha.
blindvital is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Getting out of the negatives.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO