Video Game Forums

Go Back   Video Game Forums > Sony Playstation 2 & 3 > Original Socom Forums > Socom III and Socom:CA > Socom III & Socom CA General Discussion

Socom III & Socom CA General Discussion Talk anything and everything Socom III & Socom CA that doesn't deal specifically with online gameplay.


Sadow & StuNts, DeJa Vu (Part II)
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2007   #11


 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 99

Send a message via AIM to WunTime Send a message via MSN to WunTime
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bman900 View Post
Well it's not really about impressing yourself but impressing the public which right now is the members here at the Video Game Forums. Maybe you should get of your high horse and thank everyone who sat and watched your video and took the time and effort to make a few comments to make your next video better.

Thank you.
Alright since you seem like you some anything about video editing, which obviously you DON'T because it is about impressing yourself trying to think creatively to make a simple kill into something outstanding that people the public would want to watch over and over. Second I never said anything about not thanking the public every video at the end of the post I would say "thank you all for watching my videos" but it's there own opinions which I don't have to follow because it's "There own opinions" once again. For all I know someone you idolize could have posted and said something negative about this video and you would just follow along.

Anyways thank you for watching my videos. Wun

Last edited by WunTime; 07-06-2007 at 11:39 PM.
WunTime is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007   #12
Senior Member
 
oxfordfreestyl's Avatar


 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 20
Posts: 1,797

I never said I didn't like it, but you go way overboard with the effects. Once again, effects aren't editing.

Quote:
ed·it /ˈɛdɪt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ed-it] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–verb (used with object)
1. to supervise or direct the preparation of (a newspaper, magazine, book, etc.); serve as editor of; direct the editorial policies of.
2. to collect, prepare, and arrange (materials) for publication.
3. to revise or correct, as a manuscript.
4. to expunge; eliminate (often fol. by out): The author has edited out all references to his own family.
5. to add (usually fol. by in).
6. to prepare (motion-picture film, video or magnetic tape) by deleting, arranging, and splicing, by synchronizing the sound record with the film, etc.
7. Genetics. to alter the arrangement of (genes).
8. Computers. to modify or add to (data or text).
–noun
9. an instance of or the work of editing: automated machinery that allows a rapid edit of incoming news.
Once again, there is nothing bad about your video except for all the effects. You do a great job with them, there is just an over abundance of shakes and fast forwards and crap like that.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin Wong View Post
Holy damn, you made me happy oxford. I ****ing love your comparison. I'm so impressed!!! That was just the key word to describe to the total domination.

oxfordfreestyl is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007   #13


 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston area, MA
Age: 17
Posts: 656

Send a message via AIM to General_Gregory Send a message via Yahoo to General_Gregory
Quote:
Originally Posted by WunTime View Post
Damn that was the most criticizem I have ever received combining all my videos together and here I thought I did a good job. None of you guys could make anything close so, I don't mind.
You're right, when it comes to effects, I couldn't even come close. But if I spent more time editing and "effecting" (oxfords technicalities) than filming... Than I may come close. =]

But awesome effort, looks like it took forever!

I mean no disrespect here.
__________________


Last edited by General_Gregory; 07-07-2007 at 02:50 AM.
General_Gregory is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007   #14


 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 99

Send a message via AIM to WunTime Send a message via MSN to WunTime
Quote:
Originally Posted by General_Gregory View Post
You're right, when it comes to effects, I couldn't even come close. But if I spent more time editing and "effecting" (oxfords technicalities) than filming... Than I may come close. =]

But awesome effort, looks like it took forever!

I mean no disrespect here.
I doubt spending more time filming then "effecting" would anyway come close. This video had raw footage of GB Doubles only. The only way you would come close would be by filming in a respawn for 5 hours or staging it up.

- I also mean no disrespect -
-.-
WunTime is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007   #15


 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston area, MA
Age: 17
Posts: 656

Send a message via AIM to General_Gregory Send a message via Yahoo to General_Gregory
Ouh, what I meant was just that it looks like there was more time spent in the cutting room than on the camera.
Which takes a hell of a lot of patience.
And there were so many A/V synchs, that I'm curious to know if you edited it to a song, or if you just edited the hell out of it for fun, then found a song that fit, ahaha. It was crazy.

You should do film trailers.
(Pirates 3 trailer had amazing Synching.)
__________________

General_Gregory is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Sadow & StuNts, DeJa Vu (Part II)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO