Quote:
|
Originally Posted by undeadhero
why? this is stupid man...everybody wants socom 2 back.... i mean i agree with some of the stuff you guys are saying but socom 3 is better in many aspects than socom 2 was... i enjoyed socom 2 but i think the close nit maps were boring especially playing the only 2 or 3 good maps that there was in socom 2... not everything is going to be perfect... the ps2 is almost 6 years old now...zipper was pushing the system to its limits and in the end, they came up with an amazing FREE online game...its time for a change new maps ect...socom 2 maps were good but i look forward to new senerios, instead of the same old maps from s2.... im not trying to flame but i cant stand reading about why socom 2 was way better... to me if you dont like s3 then stop wasting your breath on these forums and go back to s2...sorry i had to vent...but i agree some of the aspects in socom 2 were better... but paled in comparrison to socom 3....-undead-
|
Thank you. I agree with you completely.
Zipper did a f'ing good job on this game. They wan't to do something different. How interesting is game developing if you spend years creating the exact same game over and over again? I'm glad they did something different. I feel I got my moneys worth. The new gameplay is killer. I enjoy it. I love 16vs16 because its different. Even though most of the time I play the small version. They even made sure that they kept some of the socom2 gameplay to make us happy. If you perfer socom2 to 3 then play 2... It's that damn simple.