|
Confrontation interview & feedback survey  | 
07-18-2007
|
#1 | | Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 18
Level up: 72%, 71 Points needed |
Rep Power: 0 | Confrontation interview & feedback survey
Just passing on some information and a survey...
As usual, prior to a SOCOM release we're trying to get across the important information to the development team. (and I see you guys are discussing a "petition" as well)
It is pretty obvious that the fans of SOCOM are all on the same page... The worry is that the developers just don't get it.
Article: SOCOM Confrontation: Various Details from Seth Luisi
Survey: SOCOM Confrontation - Pre-Release Feedback ______________________  | 
|  | |
07-18-2007
|
#2 | | Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 142
Level up: 4%, 192 Points needed |
Rep Power: 2 | I took the Survey. Thanks for the information. | |
| | |
07-18-2007
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,537
Points: 14,313, Level: 51 | Level up: 94%, 37 Points needed |
Rep Power: 8 | Quote: |
Specifically to this broader audience, when asked about the large drop off of online players with the release of SOCOM 3 and Combined Assault, Luisi says he attributes that mostly to the addition of the credit card verification.
| I found that quite laughable. Luckily it was being stressed throughout the interview about returning the game back to the ways of Socom 1 and 2. I would be very happy if all the maps were 8v8 only, but I don't think that is going to happen. | |
| | |
07-18-2007
|
#4 | | Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: ..New England Age: 20
Posts: 1,373
Level up: 18%, 287 Points needed |
Rep Power: 5 | I took the survey, and good interview.
It's nice to see that they acknowledge that some of their stuff does not work right, like the search feature for getting games and the ranking system. It definitely seems like that want to bring back all the players that stopped playing during the course of Socom 3 and CA. | |
| | |
07-18-2007
|
#5 | | Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: On the edge ...... of my bed, about to fall out. Name: Call me e_town Age: 18
Posts: 2,634
PS3 ID : Subject-17 Level up: 88%, 55 Points needed |
Rep Power: 7 | I saw your site a long time ago, and the article a few days ago. Nice job on both, its great to see there is another clan out there that can actually communicate with the developers.
Although I have to admit I had a hard time choosing between the weapons vs the map sizes on socom 3.... Ultimately I went with weapons since even playing on fault, citadel, or another small map can still suck. Don't get me wrong, I've had a lot of fun on S3, but not even in the same category of fun that I had with socom 2, heck even with Socom (original).
The only thing I didn't like that Seth said (well, that I disagreed to a rather great extent) was that they thought the verification system is what killed socom 3. How many people actually did that one time registration again, how many hundreds of thousands? If that was the problem, Socom 3 wouldn't of slowly died, it would of just never took off in the first place, which definitely wasn't the case. Don't get me wrong, the verification most definitely did have a negative impact on the game, just not nearly as much as the change in gameplay did.
Last edited by Subject 17; 07-18-2007 at 08:20 PM.
| |
| | |
07-19-2007
|
#6 | | Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 25
Level up: 54%, 69 Points needed |
Rep Power: 2 | Hey man, thanks for takign the time to get that out to us. Good stuff. Quote: |
He seemed more or less aware of the desires from the “hard core” SOCOM players but appears to believe that the game should be tailored for a broader audience.
| I don't know if this is really important, but it doesn't sound so great to me. If it's online only shouldn't the game be tailored for the hardcore gamer? The casual fans are typically people who buy it for the single player mode, but that won't even be available. I don't see casual fans being too interested in all the new features, like customized clan uniforms, whereas hardcore fans will love it. Oh well, hopefully it will work out. Maybe Seth just isn't a good interview guy haha. | |
| | |
08-08-2007
|
#7 | | Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 49
Xbox 360 ID : biznitz PS3 ID : biznitz Level up: 50%, 127 Points needed |
Rep Power: 4 | Bump for the survey.. I know Zipper/Sony's pigeon boy reads the SCEA boards so I'm sure the developers do read over the results.
______________________
PSN: biznitz
K/D: 4087-1471 | |
| | |
08-08-2007
|
#8 | | Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 324
Level up: 99%, 2 Points needed |
Rep Power: 4 | The radar has got to go. If your in someones "field of view" and you are a red dot the element of suprise is gone, gayyy. ______________________  | |
| | |
08-09-2007
|
#9 | | Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Iowa. Age: 15
Posts: 947
PS3 ID : urbyballinjt Level up: 68%, 82 Points needed |
Rep Power: 0 | Nice info, I took the survey as well. | |
| | |
08-11-2007
|
#10 | | Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 23
Level up: 3%, 146 Points needed |
Rep Power: 2 | thanx for the info ts (thread starter). i too took the survey. | |
| | |
08-18-2007
|
#11 | | Graphics Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: California, USA Requests: 161
Posts: 7,429
PS3 ID : Parkway-D Points: 27,120, Level: 72 | Level up: 10%, 680 Points needed |
Rep Power: 13 | If the field of view for the radar is small, why have it at all? If an enemy appears on your radar only when you can physically see them, it won't really matter, as you would be probably shooting at them.
However, if you are able to see enemies on your radar when they are behind objects, this is a big NO. The element of surprise and stealth is gone completely.
______________________
Stationed at Fort Drum, New York with the 10th Mountain Division (Light Infantry). Rifleman/Designated Marksman | |
| | |
08-20-2007
|
#12 | | Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Southwest, PA Age: 17
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Scuba Steve  If the field of view for the radar is small, why have it at all? If an enemy appears on your radar only when you can physically see them, it won't really matter, as you would be probably shooting at them.
However, if you are able to see enemies on your radar when they are behind objects, this is a big NO. The element of surprise and stealth is gone completely. | good point, but if your a sniper lying in the grass -- what would the point of a guilie [spelling?] be if all the other person would have to do is glace in the direction, or run past you unknowingly and POP! an ; icon that pretty much says "HERE I AM! SHOOT ME NOW!" appears over your head
also -- about the question concerning the weapons -- they ABSOLUTELY need to fix this... i actually liked it better when you had a sniper, you could shoot whatever you could see, but now the case is on prowler i know being 100% sure -- the M16 reaches farther than a sniper, possibly the IW-80-A2 but im not quite sure on that one. | |
| | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | |
Confrontation interview & feedback survey |
|
