SOCOM update 03 JAN 07

[Razzor7]

I still think it's campers that make this game less fun. Rank ups don't bother me and Code 9 doesn't bother me.

Oh, and just to stick it to the man real quick:

If I'm correct (I could be wrong) TOU/OSC doesn't allow quicksniping because it's unrealistic. Lets say you're playing a Suppression. You get up 2 guys (we'll say 6-4) and camp in your spawn. How is that realistic? The goal is TO ELIMINATE YOUR ENEMY. Real SEALs don't say "OK, we killed a couple and they got Larry, but let's cut our losses and catch a quick nap."

[SoggyMilk]

Razzor, it's not about the realism, in regards to camping...

If I've got the upper hand, and you've got one guy left, I'm ordering all my guys to sit back, and let the enemy risk his teams win, and his avatar's life, so that we don't have to do it.

If he chooses to sit back, and camp, then he'll have a loss to explain, If we rush out, and get into a 3v1 situation, and lose to someone who's a clutch, then we've got a loss to explain.

The fact is, it's about winning. If you've got victory secured, you're not going to risk it by running out there and getting all your guys killed.... NO!

[OTTER]

Originally Posted by Razzor7

I still think it's campers that make this game less fun. Rank ups don't bother me and Code 9 doesn't bother me.

Oh, and just to stick it to the man real quick:

If I'm correct (I could be wrong) TOU/OSC doesn't allow quicksniping because it's unrealistic. Lets say you're playing a Suppression. You get up 2 guys (we'll say 6-4) and camp in your spawn. How is that realistic? The goal is TO ELIMINATE YOUR ENEMY. Real SEALs don't say "OK, we killed a couple and they got Larry, but let's cut our losses and catch a quick nap."

Lmfao. If they want to cut out realism in their clan they better not be switching seats in a vehicle, because that's crazy unrealistic. I hope people are getting demoted over that ****. And yeah, I don't give two shits about rank ups, probably because they all blow at the game and if you ever play against one you own them and they abort. Campers are the ones that aggrevate me.

If he chooses to sit back, and camp, then he'll have a loss to explain, If we rush out, and get into a 3v1 situation, and lose to someone who's a clutch, then we've got a loss to explain.

Lmao that's pathetic. Do you seriously NEED all 3 guys in a 3v1? Ouch. "Ok guys lets rush him!" *Johnn clutchface dies* "OMFG OUR ONLY GOOD PLAYE RETREAT!"

Razzor isn't talking about what you do to win. He's talking about if you ban something unrealistic in the game from anyone doing it in your clan, then camping when you kill a few guys is equally unrealistic and therefore your logic is flawed in banning QSing.

Real seals don't QS. I'd like to see you QS in real life. Yeah, I couldn't
Real seals don't kill 1 terrorist at the compound then run back somewhere and wait for HQ to extract

Both equally unrealistic. However, this is a video game. It's not real life nor is it realistic. If it's so realistic why can't you blow up mines hmm? So QSing isn't realistic and should be allowed if camping in suppressions isn't realistic yet is obviously widely accepted.

Sure, ban the stuff that takes skill and owns noobs/campers, but allow the thing that's camper-friendly. How typical of the average clan these days.

[.Freed.]

Originally Posted by [TOU]Warfaze.

Lol right.

And to Soggy, I am only 17, and I have only been in two clans and still in one, both 18+/mature people. Thanks for the advice, but I have to deal with idiots in a nightly basis so I am used to it. Let them do their complaining, I'll do mine.

Im the same age as you are.
I agree with Razzor and otter.

[SoggyMilk]

Originally Posted by OTTER

Lmfao. If they want to cut out realism in their clan they better not be switching seats in a vehicle, because that's crazy unrealistic. I hope people are getting demoted over that ****. And yeah, I don't give two shits about rank ups, probably because they all blow at the game and if you ever play against one you own them and they abort. Campers are the ones that aggrevate me.


Lmao that's pathetic. Do you seriously NEED all 3 guys in a 3v1? Ouch. "Ok guys lets rush him!" *Johnn clutchface dies* "OMFG OUR ONLY GOOD PLAYE RETREAT!"

Razzor isn't talking about what you do to win. He's talking about if you ban something unrealistic in the game from anyone doing it in your clan, then camping when you kill a few guys is equally unrealistic and therefore your logic is flawed in banning QSing.

Real seals don't QS. I'd like to see you QS in real life. Yeah, I couldn't
Real seals don't kill 1 terrorist at the compound then run back somewhere and wait for HQ to extract

Both equally unrealistic. However, this is a video game. It's not real life nor is it realistic. If it's so realistic why can't you blow up mines hmm? So QSing isn't realistic and should be allowed if camping in suppressions isn't realistic yet is obviously widely accepted.

Sure, ban the stuff that takes skill and owns noobs/campers, but allow the thing that's camper-friendly. How typical of the average clan these days.

Dude, I'm talking about the other team. Do you not remember one of the ASQ v S3 wars? There'd be about 3 or so ASQ Members, and one S3 Clutch Player would massacre the remaining ASQ guys.

That's what I'm talking about.


Honestly, I've given up on the "realistic" aspect of SOCOM... It's not meant to be realistic as far as I'm concerned. The only REALISTIC game out there would be Armed Assault, and/or Operation Flashpoint. Ask Razzor, he'll tell you himself.

This game is more like QUAKE/DOOM than anything else...

[shad0w0089]

Is this patch supposed to be for socom 3 or combined assault because i haven't seen the patch update thing yet....

[--RUCKUS--]

Originally Posted by shad0w0089

Is this patch supposed to be for socom 3 or combined assault because i haven't seen the patch update thing yet....

It isn't a patch.. just an addition to the News section in community. A patch is usually when they fix something either internal in the game such as bugs or glitches or add things like map packs and what not.

[DarkFlames]

This game is more like QUAKE/DOOM than anything else...

how is it like doom? not trying to argue but that's a wierd thing to say.. Quake and Doom are both first person... CA is 3rd.. just saying

[Razzor7]

Yeah, Soggy I wasn't talking about ASQ. I was just making a point about the guys who ban quicksniping as unrealistic and at the same time jump (5 feet, BALLA!!!!!!), snipe with silenced guns (Tom Berenger x15), and refuse to extract hostages to ensure a draw (Damsel in distress? **** that, we're up a round!).

It's just SO obvious they ban quicksniping because they're too lazy/stupid to learn to do it themselves. Of course it's unrealistic, but since when is ANY video game realistic? You can't have a realistic video game because there is one thing no game can duplicate: The fear of death. Although I guess Zipper must have come pretty close with a 3 minute timer, the way some people play this game.

[[TOU]Warfaze.]

Originally Posted by Razzor7

If I'm correct (I could be wrong) TOU/OSC doesn't allow quicksniping because it's unrealistic. Lets say you're playing a Suppression. You get up 2 guys (we'll say 6-4) and camp in your spawn. How is that realistic? The goal is TO ELIMINATE YOUR ENEMY. Real SEALs don't say "OK, we killed a couple and they got Larry, but let's cut our losses and catch a quick nap."

TOU does not limit any weapons, nor quicksniping. We have couple quicksnipers in our clan. Realism in this game doesn't exist, we dont give 2 shits about realism, just have fun and win the rounds. Same goes with OSC, any OSC rooms doesn't limit any weapons, its the clan making the OSC room has the choice of limiting any weapon they want. THis game was never about realism, its about winning, whether it be camping when it be 5 v 1.