Range Rant

[babygushue]

Originally Posted by Focus

Okay? If you're using the same gun as him..kill him before he kills you? Get that headshot on him first? Shoot 4 shots (I'm pretty sure it's more than 4 shots..atleast for me it is) on him before he does to you? OR pull out a 1 shot kill rifle and take 2 shots at the most.

Ok, you need to actually experience this before we argue further. Since you clearly were un aware of the fact of this new infinate range deal.

[Superstar]

Go ****ing fill up zippers boards with this ****. We dont care, if your that pissed off, dont play devils road, in fact, dont play at all. Have you forgotton that we only play games to have some fun for a few hours.

Stop flaming people that dont agree with you, you ****ing wannabe facist.

Its not people glitching, its sony's problem so let them fix it, if they ever do!

[babygushue]

Originally Posted by SuPeRsTaRRRRR

Go ****ing fill up zippers boards with this ****. We dont care, if your that pissed off, dont play devils road, in fact, dont play at all. Have you forgotton that we only play games to have some fun for a few hours.

Stop flaming people that dont agree with you, you ****ing wannabe facist.

Its not people glitching, its sony's problem so let them fix it, if they ever do!

Way off topic, maybe if your parents went out and medicated you for your ADD problem would you be able to read the first three threads. Untill then your post is irrelevant.

[.Freed.]

Originally Posted by babygushue

Way off topic, maybe if your parents went out and medicated you for your ADD problem would you be able to read the first three threads. Untill then your post is irrelevant.

So is this topic. Owned.

[cj_7986]

Originally Posted by babygushue

There is no crying, but meaningful debate about what should and should not be porgrammed into the game. You people are the ones who have the attention problems that can not stay on topic.

What is there to debate about? Everyone knows the ranges are messed up, there's nothing to debate about. You make no sence kid, you keep tripping over all your own responces.

[babygushue]

Originally Posted by SN1P1NG_L3G3ND

What is there to debate about? Everyone knows the ranges are messed up, there's nothing to debate about. You make no sence kid, you keep tripping over all your own responces.

Not everyone feels the ranges are messed up, that is the debate. I am saying the ranges are messed up and need to be fixed and others are saying the ranges are not messed up. Please choose a side and debate your reasons or simply leave the thread. Simple.

[babygushue]

Originally Posted by Focus

You're wrong. For you to kill them from that far off, you need a HEADSHOT. Sure, you can kill them without getting a headshot, but you'd have to shoot them atleast 10 times in the chest. One shot kill rifle > that. What's so hard for YOU to understand?

I will repeat again just to make this thread turn back on topic. Infinite range gives players the ability to shoot from far distances and still be able to hurt the player as if they were 2 meters away. Before players who used the m16 had to shoot a player many more times to get a kill from a far away range. Nowadays players can put 4 m16 bullets in the chest of an enemy and get the kill even if the enemy is extremly far away. With this distance it means the m16 will be basically silent with a slight mussle flash. This also means that there is hardly any reason to use guns like the m87 and m82. To those who like it the new way please present your ideas and logic behind your opinions. Thanks.

[Focus]

Originally Posted by babygushue

Ok, you need to actually experience this before we argue further. Since you clearly were un aware of the fact of this new infinate range deal.

Yes, I AM aware of it..and see what I said before, there is a difference between infinite range and increased range.

Infinite range would be an instance where you can shoot and kill someone from across the map, not even being able to see them.

Increased range..do I have to explain?

Anyways, does it really matter? If you don't want to get 4 shot-sniped by an M16, either don't be out in the open where you can snipe, or..don't be out in the open to get sniped?

*News flash* 95% of people on Socom 3 snipe..

But yes, I agree with you in a way. From far ranges like that, the gun DOES seem to be silent, so you have to look for the muzzle flash, which even at that it's hard to distinguish where the person's head is.
Only thing is, I haven't been in rooms where people use M16s in that way..all the people use snipers.

And I like the increased range some of the time, because if there are people on the opposing side that are douche's/camp all day, I'll do the same to him but with a silenced IW or STG...just ask deathabit.. :)

[B_Sully]

if you don't like it, then don't play that's all. complain all you want because this is the game, zipper won't fix anything. just don't turn on your ps2 everyday and put socom 3 in, if its that bad.

[babygushue]

Originally Posted by B_Sully

if you don't like it, then don't play that's all. complain all you want because this is the game, zipper won't fix anything. just don't turn on your ps2 everyday and put socom 3 in, if its that bad.

The game was perfectly fine before this crap started. Zipper needs to change it back to the old way like what the last PATCH was suppose to do. I as the consumer am not going to sit back and watch Zipper destroy his own creation. He needs consumer constructive feedback, your head is just in the sand.