TEXAS BEATS USC!!!

theDopeMan · 01-06-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by KidsLikeUs

Dopeman, why do you think Bush got the heismen? If it was based on one category he wouldnt have a chance. he is a good RB, but when it comes down to it there are many more players that put up the numbers he did, in total offensive. Including Texas's RB had more offensive total yards in the season than bush did. So I don't know where you come off bragging about the setups he was used for. when he still didnt total Texas's RB's Total offensive all season.

Also, about making fun of where I live, don't be mad because your team lost in the Rose bowl, it wasnt my fault "bush" couldn't produce.

My team? Did you not read where I was to go and play baseball? A true fan of college football not one team you two really need to leard to read and comprehend a lil better. As far as"MY" team not winning let me say this. Over the past 4 years USC has 3 Heismen winners and 2 championships. Again go and look at all purpose yards avg. a game and you will see QB's and Reggie Bush. A man who took over countless games this year by making game breaking plays. He is better then and Texas Running back and will be better than any of them in the NFL. Why do you think they call him one of the best to ever play the college game. Texas had a great run this year and will NOT do it again next year. They are lucky the Sooners lost most of their playes to the NFL because other than that they realy dont play anybody at all. WOW they play ! good team all year and that was OHIO St. and they won a close game. I still never once have taken away anything form Texas and yes I reread my post. I am pissed at ppl who nothing about the game and then try to justify that 1 player having 1 good game makes him the best. It makes me laugh. I am done making you two look stupid and I am done correcting you two. Now you have anice day and choke on a fat ccock.

KidsLikeUs · 01-06-2006

You didn't correct anything all you did was complain about how texas won. Cry me a river son. Who cares about the sooners, this is 2006.The fact of the matter is Texas was the better team, Bush choked, Lienart had a great game. But V. Young just ran wild on USC. So instead of watching ESPN on how good "reggie bush" is, or sucking on Bush's D!ck, get your facts straight. Learn about the topic at hand before you get into a discussion you know nothing about.

theDopeMan · 01-06-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by KidsLikeUs

You didn't correct anything all you did was complain about how texas won. Cry me a river son. Who cares about the sooners, this is 2006.The fact of the matter is Texas was the better team, Bush choked, Lienart had a great game. But V. Young just ran wild on USC. So instead of watching ESPN on how good "reggie bush" is, or sucking on Bush's D!ck, get your facts straight. Learn about the topic at hand before you get into a discussion you know nothing about.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA I love it. I know your mad cause im right and you know it. Have a great day thinking about me.

Go Pre · 01-06-2006

Thanks for spamming up my topic with your garbage. You could easily have taken this to the pm system, but no, you didn't. Thank you both for proving that you are unable to hold a civilized discussion about a topic such as this.

pV · 01-06-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go Pre

Thanks for spamming up my topic with your garbage. You could easily have taken this to the pm system, but no, you didn't. Thank you both for proving that you are unable to hold a civilized discussion about a topic such as this.

Maturity levels are at an all time low..

Anyway, I'm happy Texas won.. It was a sweet game.

Wyldeorrel · 01-06-2006

Here u go that game was amazing i am a huge texas fan which when people talk crap about them i go off. It was the best game this year by far and one of the best performances in history by Vince young.

OK now to Vince young. He is gonna do fine in the pros. He has a quick relese and has great accuracy. In that game a couple of times he threw across his body and threw the ball great which shows that he has good accuracy and has alot of streangth. Vick is a great athlete and is a threat to any defence, but Vince young is so much better he has great accuracy which vick never had in college and still doesnt have and all the other quarterbacks that u named also dont have that. He can also run he is not as fast as vick but he is sure darn close. Vick is very weak and cant take the hits. Vince young is stronger 6'5 and 230, he can take the hits he isnt afraid of getting hit when ever a defender came after him he was able to get around him and he threw like he wasnt even worried about him, even though if it were any other qb they would have prolly gotten sacked or the would have been afraid and threw a bad pass but Vince threw great passes. WHen he runs he not only can burn people and make people miss but he is so hard to tackle becasue of his size. NO moble quarteback even compares to Vince Young. SO dont say well this guy didnt make it and he was the best in college. Now Vince young will not have all that time in the pocket like he does most of the time, but because of his size he is able to see over the lineman and he has such good vision that he will be able to see anyone coming. Vick is a retard( He talks like he never got an education). Young is so much smarter and he has great leadership, which vick diddnt really have. He might not be the greatest his first year but he will be a fantastic player in the future because of his talents. Listen to any of the experts and they say that Young is fantastic. If Young goes then he will prollly be number 1.

Bush- He is a great player no question and he did win the Heisman but Young proved that he is a better athlete. Bush proved in that game that he is not an every down back casue texas ate him up. He was playing against slower LB and in the NFL he will get eaten up by the faster and more talented LB. In that game Texas was so fast and was able to not let Bush beat them outside forcing him to go out of bounds multiple times. He is a great player no question and i still think he is gonna be a great NFL back, but he showed that he cant be an everydown back and in the NFL that wont work very well. Just watch ESpn all the experts are changing there mind on who is the best and they all pick YOung because he is just fantastic he is a defenses nightmare he can both run and pass. Much better of a weapon than Bush.

Texas was young last year and years before that is why they never could win it. But when YOung got older he was able to just take the game in his hands and beat the best teams. Even with all the player on the Oklahoma team Texas would win, becasue whenever they played them Vince just couldnt get the job done cause he was to young. Now that he is older and he developed an arm for passing he is great and he will be great in years to come so dont say that USC with all these 3 years and crap cause no one cares it is all about this yea and Texas handed it to them. There were alot of calls that went USC way. USC is a great team and is one of the best in history no question but how do u know that texas wasnt they never played them. The reason is that USC lost no one they had all there great players, Texas lost a lot of great defensive player just imagine if texas had all thier defensive lineman and "Derrick Johnson" They would own with Youngs great play.

Bottom line YOung great player gonna be goood.

Allstar · 01-06-2006

Bush be successful in the NFL? Please, he will be drafted by the Houstan Texans. Or Some other ****** team. Sure, he has a bright future. But USC didnt make history. They lost in the Rose bowl to a better team. They aren't that great. Sure they only lost like two games. But there's been other teams that are so much better. If you lemme ponder a bit, I'll post some teams that are far better than USC and didnt win the rose bowl or NCAA Championship.

Workman23 · 01-06-2006

Obviously USC would have won if they would have called back that touchdown on Vince's leg being on the ground when he piched it...

Allstar · 01-06-2006

No. They wouldve kicked a fieldgoal, or his knee was down and he was past the first down marker. So Texas still wouldve won.

Wyldeorrel · 01-09-2006

Vince would have scored anyway. THey got the first down. ANd obviously Vince kicked the crap out of them all game so he would ahve ran it in for the touchdown even if they called it back. so that wasnt even a reason why they lost. Second USC did make history they won 34 in a row, That alone is the reason why they made history. They are a great team, The team itself was better than Texas but Texas had Vince Young and he was the difference maker. SO USC made history and is one of the better "TEAMS" to play. Notice i didnt say the best team casue they arent. Of cource there were a lot of better teams but that doesnt mean they didnt make history. Please proceed with the teams that are better cause i want to see what u think..