What about the Terrorists? (online)

ThE FaCe InSiDe · 03-21-2005

What are you talking about terrorist never win, terrorist win all the time and you are right the weps are a bit unfair but terrorist still win. Also all anyone uses is the m14 cause socom 2 is full of scrubs and laggers. Another thing is, is that terrorists will probably have attachments to it's not like the U.S. is the only country with good weps. Ever play mgs 2 where the terrorists had aks's with silencers and lasers maybe socom 3 will have that. Also in socom 2 none of the weps were like they should be in real life. Like the iw that gun is green and black and has a scope on top the standard seal mark 23 is all black and so is the m4 a1 etc.. you get my point. Another thing i hate is thats the m4 still doesnt look how it should, the m4's and m16's that were issued in 2003-2004 are flat tops for those of you that dont know what that means, it's when the top of the gun is flat like the m16 a2 in socom 2 which is not how the a2 really looks because only the a3's and a4's are flat tops any thats of topic but i think should share that and i know some of you really dont give a fu%# but im just sayin cause zipper is all like they try to base the game of real seals as much as possible even though that is a big lie. Back to terrosists in socom3 the game seems like it will be more even but i hope they have just some better weps for the terrorists like a 45. or a silenced smg that would be sweet. One last thing is that what is with Socom 2 and 50 caliber snipers, those weps are mostly for taking out vehicles and tanks there not really meant for people cause in reality they'd cut you in half they should have, if they wanted to make there seals look more like real seals then they should have talked with the guy that made tears of the sun which is a kick *** movie about seals that have to go extract this doctor and end up in a whole load of crap but like i said before most of you are like who cares i just wanted to state my opinion.

infiltrater900 · 03-21-2005

while struggling to read your post on account of lack of punctuation and flow of words, i have decided you made some good points. however with the way the gun looks down the the tinyest point i think that is a little too picky

Subject 17 · 03-21-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThE FaCe InSiDe

What are you talking about terrorist never win, terrorist win all the time and you are right the weps are a bit unfair but terrorist still win. Also all anyone uses is the m14 cause socom 2 is full of scrubs and laggers. Another thing is, is that terrorists will probably have attachments to it's not like the U.S. is the only country with good weps. Ever play mgs 2 where the terrorists had aks's with silencers and lasers maybe socom 3 will have that. Also in socom 2 none of the weps were like they should be in real life. Like the iw that gun is green and black and has a scope on top the standard seal mark 23 is all black and so is the m4 a1 etc.. you get my point. Another thing i hate is thats the m4 still doesnt look how it should, the m4's and m16's that were issued in 2003-2004 are flat tops for those of you that don't know what that means, it's when the top of the gun is flat like the m16 a2 in socom 2 which is not how the a2 really looks because only the a3's and a4's are flat tops any thats of topic but i think should share that and i know some of you really don't give a fu%# but im just sayin cause zipper is all like they try to base the game of real seals as much as possible even though that is a big lie. Back to terrosists in socom3 the game seems like it will be more even but i hope they have just some better weps for the terrorists like a 45. or a silenced smg that would be sweet. One last thing is that what is with Socom 2 and 50 caliber snipers, those weps are mostly for taking out vehicles and tanks there not really meant for people cause in reality they'd cut you in half they should have, if they wanted to make there seals look more like real seals then they should have talked with the guy that made tears of the sun which is a kick <font color="#FF0000">*censored*</font> movie about seals that have to go extract this doctor and end up in a whole load of crap but like i said before most of you are like who cares i just wanted to state my opinion.

yeah they really arent doing there best at making it as real as possible. like the friggin "F-90" 1st its called the P-90 and 2nd its way better than that. its not a submachinegun its like an IW-80 any way i think i have that part posted somewhere else and the guns that the seals use all lok diff and same with the terrorists. they really need to improve upon their graphics, but i hope they do some of the other stuff that needs fixed first

WickedCarniDemon · 03-22-2005

the game is prety even becusae if u dont like them using tha weapon kill one of em take there gun then use it ur self they only have the advantage in the begining when they start out with tha gun but ur a terrprist cam p a bit wai tfor a guy then gang rape him with a few of ur buddys then team kill to get his gun lol

shapz · 03-25-2005

I only read the 1st 2 paragraphs of what al wrote....and i agree with you completly. The SEALS made the game so you think they would favor themselves. I definetly would! If i made a new name and only played as a seal i could get my rank to a cookie in about a day. It would take a week as a terrorist! Socom makes the terrorists seem puny compared to the SEALS.

Some people say the terrorists have the STG 77 as their IW. But it is no comparison! The IW is accurate and powerful at all ranges! Not only that but the SEALS have guns like the RA-14 and the HK5. When you think about it the M4A1 is the main seal gun. The 552 is the main Terrorist gun, and just lookng at that you can tell it is unfair

The mOBSCENE · 03-25-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by shapz

When you think about it the M4A1 is the main seal gun. The 552 is the main Terrorist gun, and just lookng at that you can tell it is unfair

So what you are saying is that the SEALs are jipped because they don't get the 552? I am sorry but if you look past the slow fire rate and actualy took the time to use the 552 you would be highly impressed. I find it so easy to use this gun and have plenty to show for it when I lead the terrorist side as far as kills go.

And the STG? Again, what is wrong with this gun. Who cares if it is innacurate long range, learn to use the map and building and terrain to YOUR advantage. Duck behind cover and flank around. Get the IW user close to YOU and see who wins. If you can trick your opponent and predict his next move or leave him with one option and make him do it, you will have complete control over him.

Just learn to use the damn guns. :P

Magnum Force · 03-25-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by The mOBSCENE

And the STG? Again, what is wrong with this gun. Who cares if it is innacurate long range, learn to use the map and building and terrain to YOUR advantage.

I agree. The STG is a major factor on the Terrorists side. I actually enjoy sniping with it.

(mOB, how's my sig coming along?)