What about the Terrorists? (online)

RadioactiveMan · 03-20-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dboyz-x.etown

Let the terrorists have something!

They have stuff, dumbass. The teams aren't even because they're different teams. How about they just make the teams identical and call them Seorrists 1 and Seorrists 2?

Subject 17 · 03-20-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by RadioactiveMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dboyz-x.etown

Let the terrorists have something!

They have stuff, dumbass. The teams aren't even because they're different teams. How about they just make the teams identical and call them Seorrists 1 and Seorrists 2?

dude i mean that they are greatly killed in this feild, and i was just pointing outn that it dosent matter. where you got the absolution theroy that i want every one to be nammed bob and everyine the same rating and everyone have the same weapons confuses me. i jsut want the terrorists to have something cool like an OICW to balence out the SEAL utopia.

Deathmonger · 03-21-2005

They should simply make the terrorist's weapons slightly better, Seals weapons are just too good compared to the Seals's weapons. If they just make the weapons a little better with the board advanatage for terrorists, everything will be just fine.

wizardvj · 03-21-2005

WoW, all this talk about terrs getting equal stuff. HELLO!! Look at the maps already. Fishhook, Last Bastion, Liberation, Sujo, and however many more are already in favor of the terrs. Think about it. Why cant the terrs protect some type of terrvip that the seals have to kill off before they get them out? Or why cant the seals have base where the terrs are attacking back for a change so the seals can nade the piss out of them? If you have been playing socom and have half a brain you would see that most of the maps are in favor of the terrs. The m14 is one heck of a weapon on either side you use it on. If you cant handle the gun then maybe you need some more practice. Why should the terrs get better weapons? They have great weapons already. Do the seals have the beautiful one shot kill pistol called the DE50? Come on, get over it, terrs get the maps in favor of them, then the weapons in favor of them, then everyone will be on terrs side and will be complaining about seals not having good enough weapons and maps. Jeezze

Subject 17 · 03-21-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by wizardvj

WoW, all this talk about terrs getting equal stuff. HELLO!! Look at the maps already. Fishhook, Last Bastion, Liberation, Sujo, and however many more are already in favor of the terrs. Think about it. Why can't the terrs protect some type of terrvip that the seals have to kill off before they get them out? Or why can't the seals have base where the terrs are attacking back for a change so the seals can nade the piss out of them? If you have been playing socom and have half a brain you would see that most of the maps are in favor of the terrs. The m14 is one heck of a weapon on either side you use it on. If you can't handle the gun then maybe you need some more practice. Why should the terrs get better weapons? They have great weapons already. Do the seals have the beautiful one shot kill pistol called the DE50? Come on, get over it, terrs get the maps in favor of them, then the weapons in favor of them, then everyone will be on terrs side and will be complaining about seals not having good enough weapons and maps. Jeezze

w mean that as of now, the terrorists have like 1 weapon better than seals that the seals dont have. and we only have 1 silenced weapon. and what the hell is Liberation and Last bastion? is that for the hdd?

AL GIORDINO · 03-21-2005

If anyone knows me, I always say that the sides are generally equal. We all know the Terrorists are supposed to hold back and defend their base with their close range guns, but how often does it actually happen? Yeah the two sides could be equal if people did that, but they simply don't.

That's the problem.. Yeah they are equal if you have two experienced teams and each knows what to do.. BUT it's not equal when 75% of the captains in any particular game are on the Seals so they can use the M4A1or IW and rush! (which lets be honest is more fun than camping)

It's NOT EQUAL when Terrorist's run and gun and get slaughtered at far distance by an M4A1 (sd) or IW, instead of sitting back and camping. That's the whole thing.. give people what they want.. people want two equal sides where both sides can rush, and run and gun..

This is why Crossroads is the most popular map!!! <- Dispute that!

Forget how it's "supposed" to be, look at the game how it is!

TERRORISTS LOSE MOST OF THE TIME, END OF STORY. Player's dont want a game where one side defends and one side on offense, they want a game where both sides are on offense, which is exactly why most Terrorists play like they do. (and lose)

These are simple facts that should be recognized and then fixed and implemented into Socom 3.. That's all...

BTW if anyone here has ever played Counter Strike, you can absolutely attest to the fact that in that game, both sides have different (BUT EQUAL) guns. And this is THE most popular online shooter EVER. Even though Socom has better gameplay imo and blows CS away, they have done a number of things in CS thats better than Socom too.

RadioactiveMan · 03-21-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by wizardvj

Why can't the terrs protect some type of terrvip that the seals have to kill off before they get them out?

Actually, that isn't a bad idea. They could make an escort map like the last mission (or perhaps second last) of SOCOM I- the one where you had to kill Fat Cat.

->L<- COYOTE · 03-21-2005

All zipper needs to do is get rid of IW's and make it so people can make rooms with no launched explosives. exp. nade launchers and at-4's. And people that are complaining aboutt m-14's screw them, cuz it's a twenty round clip and its not very accurate on automatic, all you have to do shoot the person with tha m-14 from a distance. Cuz once they get close to you, your dead!! And anybody who justify's an IW to the STG is just stupid and needs to be shot!!! This is my opinion so don't take offence to it!!! See yall in my sights!

Subject 17 · 03-21-2005

no, the iw should stay, cause its a good gun. that would jsut mean that the **** would mess it up for the frest of us. just make it weaker. and i aggre with AL. the terrorist usually do camp and stuff, but i think that we should give the M87ELR to the terrorists, and give the SEALs a New Sniper. One like the M87ELR and M82A1A. or mabey make the M82A1A the SASR version. in reality, the SASR is usually a term put onto other Snipers, and they dont suck.

And Crossroads is the best map.

wizardvj · 03-21-2005

Keep in mind that most of the maps ARE in favor of the terrs. Yes, liberation and last bastion are 2 of the 3 new maps for the hdd. If someone wants to complain about how THEY play the game doesnt work, then maybe they should change their game plan? I play fishhook alot. That is my map. You cant say crap about the terrs guns and rushing because I have seen it time and time again when terrs rush and wipe out the seals in 30 seconds or so, round after round after round. Yes the terrs probably could stand to get a few more good weapons. But they have the m14(my fav on terrs and seals side), the m16 and the de50. Show me a one shot kill pistol that the seals have. Think about what you are saying though. The maps (75%) are in favor of the Terrs. Seals invade THEIR turff. They have the advantage there. Add better weapons to them. When will the seals win? From what I see, most of the time, if terrs play the maps they way they should, they win. You want a map to rush on, go pick one! I like the set up that is on there now, and yes, I play seals with a m14 on Fishhook unless I decide to just pull out the sp10 for a few days. Adds more of a challenge. lol.