OFFICIAL "BUSH WINS" THREAD

SuperYooper · 11-02-2004

I hate to be over confident, but im gonna go out on a limb. Feel free to return to this thread when all the votes have been tabulated, and George Bush retains his presidency.

YAY

The mOBSCENE · 11-02-2004

all i can say is that Kerry just does NOT deserve that office from Bush. he will just screw EVERYTHING up. he is indescisive with his desicions and has no intelligence of what is going on over-seas. why put a new president into office while we are at war over-seas. dont get me wrong... Kerry does know about whats going on over there but, he does not have the knowledge of what Bush has right now just because of some of this knowledge is only for the president.

i know a lot of people are not voting for Bush because they believe that he is stupid. Bush is a bad public speaker... he knows what he's doing.

and another good majority is going to vote for kerry because he claims he would bring troops back from over-seas. family members and loved ones want their friends, family, loved ones back and Bush wont do this. these people are just way too ignorant to relize that when someone signs up for the military, they are putting thereselves under the supervision of the military. getting sent into war is part of the job description when you sign up for this, and these people know this when they do sign up. your not going to go into the military to go over-seas for one week and then get sent back because someone b1tches about you being over there. i know its a bad thing to say but we do need those troops where they are at and we needed them to fight for what they fought for when we first sent them over there. Bush had very strong intelligence about WMDs in iraq... what would anyother person in office do? EXACTLY!! they would go into iraq and check out the situation. kerry continuously critisizes bush for his actions when in fact, kerry supported him fully at the beginning just as 90% of America after 9/11 but now that we know what we know, kerry changes sides (of course) and is now against bush just because the democratic side wants a president that is against the war. i dont care who you are, any other person in office would have went into iraq like this and not regret it. it was the smartest desicion at the time. and last time i checked, no one can predict the future so he did what was needed!

i have PLEANTY of other reasons why bush should dominate kerry but i will only get into one more. it may seem more like a subject of why women would vote for bush but i am completley against all forms of abortion. stem cell research? how about morality and ethics? this is still murder and i feel sorry for any doctor that has to perform these acts of murder because they do not know what they are really getting into. there are two ways a women gets pregnant. rape, and because they decided to. whats that you say? what about the "accidental" babies? nope, that falls under the category of because they decided to. other than rape, pregnancy comes from the womens desicion to actualy have sex/un-safe sex. by having sex, you are putting yourself at risk for many drawbacks. if a woman makes that desicion, why would they be so ignorant to not even take responsibility? that just shows that they cant handle themselves, let alone another life. they cant even make the desicion to be responsible!

and partial abortion is just sick... for you people who dont know what this is, it is where they stick a hook like object up and crack the babies skull so that they can slide out. now that is just completley immoral and sick!

also, why is it that kerry is FOR death tax? why the f-ck would you make someone pay for dying!!??!? what the f-ck is that!?!? you cant even f-cking die in the country without being taxed. now this is only if kerry gets into office. another form of taxing that kerry is FOR is marriage tax. getting married already costs an arm and a leg. now you have to pay on top of your own expensive planning just to please kerry? f-ck him!

im going to stop now before i really start to heat up.

GO BUSH/CHENEY '04!!!

reclinerace · 11-02-2004

(comes back in time machine) George Bush wins and punches carry in his friggin face!!

DaKilla · 11-02-2004

Sadly, I think you're right. I think that too many morons are voting for Bush.

Just my opinion, but trust me, I have my reasons. (I thought I would come in here and stop the pro-Bush lobbying a bit)

airpilot · 11-02-2004

all i can say is kerry is gonna get dominated.

Paulocas · 11-02-2004

What knowledge does Bush have? I haven't seen any WMD's...

Bush should've invaded Saudi Arabia, you know the country most linked with 9-11?

But we all know about the ***-kissing job his family does to the royal family of Saudi Arabia.

Bush has too many biases to run this country. He has to worry about his family's interests, the interests of **** Cheney's many associated companies, there's no way he can run the country for the people it's meant for... THE ****ING PEOPLE!

John Kerry may not be consistent, but at least it shows he has no fear in admitting he's wrong. To be a president you need to have some respect for the people. All Bush has done is deceive them.

And it's funny I hear people say the stupidest **** like "Oh we haven't been attacked since 9-11."

Not only is this wrong, (our troops are getting attacked EVERY day nowadays), but it's stupid to think positively of that.

Let's remind ourselves that if Bush paid real close attention every now and then 9-11 could've well been avoided. Did Bush do the necessary means to stop it? No, he didn't he neglected the information given to him. BUT when the information comes to invade Iraq, does he take it? Without a ****ing second glance. Tell me that isn't indecisive.

Bush is a normal man, he's a douchebag, an idiot, a bad comedian... but above all, and the only thing that should matter, he's a horrible president.

The mOBSCENE · 11-02-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paulocas

What knowledge does Bush have? I haven't seen any WMD's...

did you read what i typed at all? i said that Bush had very strong intell from many countried that Iraq had WMDs. a president would not sit around and just let this go on its own way. a president would do something about it, just as Bush has done. he may have been wrong but we now know that iraq, for the most part, is free of WMDs. you are not going to win everything, in fact, making mistakes is key to leadership. without making mistakes, you will never have covered every possibility and you will never learn from what was wrong. i wouldnt exactly consider this a mistake though. because as i said, we know now that iraq are not building WMDs and that is one less thing that we have to worry about.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paulocas

John Kerry may not be consistent, but at least it shows he has no fear in admitting he's wrong. To be a president you need to have some respect for the people. All Bush has done is deceive them.

really? kinda funny how he cant admit that he changed his position of his views on Bushes war in iraq. weird how he completley supports bush with his tactics in iraq until he finds out that the democrats want a candidate that is against the war in iraq. dont think thats weird? well i do...

xa · 11-02-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by The mOBSCENE

i have PLEANTY of other reasons why bush should dominate kerry but i will only get into one more. it may seem more like a subject of why women would vote for bush but i am completley against all forms of abortion. stem cell research? how about morality and ethics? this is still murder and i feel sorry for any doctor that has to perform these acts of murder because they do not know what they are really getting into. there are two ways a women gets pregnant. rape, and because they decided to. whats that you say? what about the "accidental" babies? nope, that falls under the category of because they decided to. other than rape, pregnancy comes from the womens desicion to actualy have sex/un-safe sex. by having sex, you are putting yourself at risk for many drawbacks. if a woman makes that desicion, why would they be so ignorant to not even take responsibility? that just shows that they can't handle themselves, let alone another life. they can't even make the desicion to be responsible!

and partial abortion is just sick... for you people who don't know what this is, it is where they stick a hook like object up and crack the babies skull so that they can slide out. now that is just completley immoral and sick!
[/size][/color]

How is war more acceptable than abortion? Even the pope said that these 'pro-life' people who support the war aren't really pro-life. And beyond that, since you are Roman Christian how can you support war when Jesus taught "Love thy neighbor" and all of that. It seems you picked your religion to look cool.
Actually, I think we should just vote on the issues themselves, since thats what really matters, and then just find someone who will carry them out.

The mOBSCENE · 11-02-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by xa

Quote:

Originally Posted by The mOBSCENE

i have PLEANTY of other reasons why bush should dominate kerry but i will only get into one more. it may seem more like a subject of why women would vote for bush but i am completley against all forms of abortion. stem cell research? how about morality and ethics? this is still murder and i feel sorry for any doctor that has to perform these acts of murder because they do not know what they are really getting into. there are two ways a women gets pregnant. rape, and because they decided to. whats that you say? what about the "accidental" babies? nope, that falls under the category of because they decided to. other than rape, pregnancy comes from the womens desicion to actualy have sex/un-safe sex. by having sex, you are putting yourself at risk for many drawbacks. if a woman makes that desicion, why would they be so ignorant to not even take responsibility? that just shows that they can't handle themselves, let alone another life. they can't even make the desicion to be responsible!

and partial abortion is just sick... for you people who don't know what this is, it is where they stick a hook like object up and crack the babies skull so that they can slide out. now that is just completley immoral and sick!
[/size][/color]

How is war more acceptable than abortion? Even the pope said that these 'pro-life' people who support the war aren't really pro-life. And beyond that, since you are Roman Christian how can you support war when Jesus taught "Love thy neighbor" and all of that. It seems you picked your religion to look cool.
Actually, I think we should just vote on the issues themselves, since thats what really matters, and then just find someone who will carry them out.

i never said that war is more acceptable. show me where it says that please...

and no, i did not pick my religion to look cool, i picked it because i believe in it. you cant AVOID war when its right in front of you. because i have my beliefs doesnt mean that war is not going to happen. there is nothing i can do about it other than support our troops. when it comes to defending this country, the country not only myself, but my friends family and loved ones live in, i leave it to the president to help protect. i NEVER said i was for the war, i said that i supported Bush's idea with what he got into because leaving such a powerful subject like that alone could spell trouble.

xa · 11-02-2004

True you never said war was acceptable but it was implied.
True war is inevitable, but does that mean anything.
In vietnam we suffered about 40 000 casualties before leaving, all for a pointless war.
Do we have to wait until we get 40 000 casualties in Iraq before we leave?

And yes I'm sure anyone nearly anywhere would do whatever it takes to keep their family safe. But how is aggression going to stop it, dropping bombs won't fix it. I know Kerry isn't very promising. But Bush is less promising, but thats just my opinion and is only worth as much as yours or anyone elses(nothing).