Quote:
|
Originally Posted by xa
True you never said war was acceptable but it was implied.
True war is inevitable, but does that mean anything.
In Vietnam we suffered about 40 000 casualties before leaving, all for a pointless war.
Do we have to wait until we get 40 000 casualties in Iraq before we leave?
And yes I'm sure anyone nearly anywhere would do whatever it takes to keep their family safe. But how is aggression going to stop it, dropping bombs won't fix it. I know Kerry isn't very promising. But Bush is less promising, but that’s just my opinion and is only worth as much as yours or anyone else’s(nothing).
|
Quote:
You're living in Iraq (before the war). You say some remark about how terrible Saddam is, and think nothing of it. The next night, 5 people show up at your door and kidnap you and your son in front of your entire family. They'll take all your male children with them, that way they won't be alive to try to take revenge years later.
Your wife and mother receive a package in the mail two weeks later. They open up a 2-foot square box and find the heads of you and your son inside, with the eyes and nose cut off and all the teeth pulled out.
There's videotape at the bottom. Once your family gets the courage to play it, they find a 30 minute long torture video of you and your son getting your arms and legs hacked off by a chainsaw while you're both still alive.
Gruesom picture, isn't it? But then the reality sets in we Freed these people from Saddam We gave them hope and a life to look forward too. They have a working government that the people have a say in. THE BOTTOM LINE IS THIS WE HELP WE HELP WE SENT THEM FREE.
Yes the Vietnam War was a money war. To compare the Vietnam War to the IRAQ war is utter stupidity. NOT only are they total different and have hardly nothing in common, the IRAQ war was to bring down a well-known terrorist to justice. SADDAM ran IRAQ with a iron fist and who ever got in his way he killed. Simple
HE KILL
Read the above quote it's true. Let the reality of how harsh and down right awful he ran his so called "Beautiful Country" I am with BUSH 100% on his wars in Afgan and IRAQ.
If you still don't think it was a good war here I will give you more facts. OSAMA BIN LADIN. He took 3 Planes and smashed them into three of the US greatest monuments. Bush took action and declared war against all terrorists in the world. WOW you all where so happy that finally someone was going to take the matters of these actions turn them into a race to capture and justify the wrongdoing.
You BUSH haters sicken me you really do. You say he shouldn't of went to IRAQ he shouldn't of went there he didn’t do anything but kill our soldier. But wake up for real. If he didn't go in and do what he did you would all be complaining, saying "why didn’t he go in and try to do something about these damn terrorist"
Please make up your mind.
But one of the main reasons why he went in is because he had intell saying that SADDAM had Weapons of MASS Desruction.
Quote:
Think of this, image he had those WOMD and used them on America? What would you say then? I am sure you BUSH HATERS would change your view very quick.
I am with BUSH 100% and i am not even american......Anyway i think i went off no my tanget again am I am sorry if i offend anyone I didnt mean to but i just wnated to post my opinion.
|
[/u][/b]
Linear Mode
