SEAL Weapons Vs. Terrorist Weapons + the outcome!

[cab9]

ok i know sicne day one people have always complained that the have way better weapons than the terrorists. sorry to say this isn't at all true. well, there is SOME truth to it.

the SEALS weapons are EASIER to use and are way more n00b friendly, most of the guns most SEALS use are basically point, shoot, kill. They rely on either silnce and fire rite or fire rate alone. most the assualt rifles aren't terrible powerfull, just very fast, therefore ensuring a quick an easy kill.

the terrorist weapons overall are genrally more powerfull bullet to bullet compared to the SEALS guns. However, they aren't n00b friends (except for the m14 and sometimes the STG 77) these guns are harder to control and use, but the power and range is there. since the SEAL guns fire faster, terrorists must rely on how good their aim is. being a good terrorist really does take more skill than being a good SEAL.

now you may not agree with me here, but here is a rundown on some weapons and how they size up.


m4a1sd, m4a1 vs. 552sd, 552

m4a1sd is stronger, but the 522sd is quiter. they both have very good accuary and fire rate. however, the 552sd is a good match up as long as the usere can aim. we can usally get a kill with 5-7 bullets with the 552sd firing at the head level. the none silence guns work about the same as above, just not silent

IW-80, RA-14 vs. STG-77

all these guns fire very fast and fairly accurate. the SEAL guns tend to be more accurate over long range, but i've noticed through my many hours of gameplay the STG-77 seems slightly stronger bullet for bullet. in close quarters the STG-77 always takes out the IW or RA due to fire rate and that extra horse power. very fair match up with these guns.

AK-105 vs. AK-47, AKS-105

ok, the 105 fires much faster but all these guns have about the same strength ammo. the 105 seems to be a bit better at a longer range, but i think these guns are pretty close at medium-close range. the terrorist AK are deffinitly hared to aim because they aren't as accurate but if you can aim and are good at bursting its really a pretty good match up.

HK5K, HK5, HK5SD vs. F90, 9mm Sub

this is the only place i feel the seals do have a advantage over the terrorist, only because the HK5SD virtually doesn't make a sound. All these guns are typically used at close range and all seem to match up fairly well. gotta love the F90's 50 round mags.


overall, weapons ARE even, so nobody complain anymore please. the reason they seem uneven is becuase YOU lack skill and AIMING ablilty, so don't say the gun can't do it, it's you that can't do it. learn to aim and shoot smart and you will never again say that the SEALS have a clear weapon advantage.

[SilverMidKnight]

Good Job... I dont think there are any noob cannons... Because the M60E it has MAJOR RECOIl and hard to aim wit. and the AUTO shotgun is not a noob cannon b/c if you have a fast gun and skill you can eat them.. and IW is not a NOOB gun its just how good u are at one thing

[Silver Strike]

There is always gonna be someone complaining about weapons in this game, but hopefully they'll look at this and see.

Good work.

[cab9]

anything where you just hold down the trigger and point in the general direction is a n00b cannon. thus said, only 3 n00b cannons in the game, m60e3, m63a, m3 12gauge. i didn't mention shotguns above mainly because i forgot. but the 12 gauge pump can stand up to any weapon if you know how to use it

[Deathmonger]

Cab, we don't want to hear you complaining, we heard it a million times and guess what, there ARE NO NOOB GUNS! Complain all you want, guess where it will get you? Nowhere.
The M60 has bad recoil and the bullets don't go where you want it half the time, m63 is the same way jsut not as powerful. The shotgun is HORRIBLE closerange. You never see someone rush a long range distance with it because they'll get owned, you see them hiding or ambushing. That's not noobish, that's strategic. Only people call guns "noob" weapons because they get killed by them a lot or think unskilled players use them, which isn't true. People say an IW-80 is a noob gun when skilled and nonskilled players use them. Guess what, every gun was made to be used. So until they actually do create an instant kill "noob" gun, stop posting about it and instead go post at www.nobodygivesacrap.com

[cab9]

Death, least thoughtful- post i've ever read. you obviously didn't read the above closely enough. anyways, i never said the IW is n00b, i said it's n00b FRIENDLY because it is very easy? to use and get good with. read stuff every now and then. now lets end this talk of n00bishness and get back to real topic of this post. you poopy.

[Deathmonger]

I'm just angry because of your last post, NO gun is noobish. Your previous posts I agreed with most of it. But in my opinion no gun is noobish, I actually tthink the m60 and m63 take more skill to use and kill someone with because its accuracy and range is nothing compared to guns like the m14, m4a1, iw-80 or guns of that nature.
I do apologize for the outburst but I'm jsut VERY irritated of these people saying what gun is a "noob" gun. I hear it online and in the game all the time and I'm sick of it. I use all the guns, and find no gun to be noobish. The only gun that can be classfied as noobish are the grenade launcher guns because "most" unskilled" players use it. But I still don't complain if I get killed by one, its part of the game.

[dkhavoc]

hey you just have to figure out how to use different weapons some people just dont know how to aim so they think the guns suck

[.Z!dane.]

each gun has its high and low points so lets just leave it at that, except the IW doesnt really seem to have any low points except for not being silenced. other than that there is not one single gun in this game that u can do everthing with, except the OICW which is only for single player

[DaKilla]

Originally Posted by cab9

overall, weapons ARE even, so nobody complain anymore please. the reason they seem uneven is becuase YOU lack skill and AIMING ablilty, so don't say the gun can't do it, it's you that can't do it. learn to aim and shoot smart and you will never again say that the SEALS have a clear weapon advantage.

Well, going by your reasoning, and the rest of your post, I would assume that for the terrorists to win, they would have to not only be slightly better than the SEALs, since slightly better means they can use the games the same, which means it would be even. But the Terrorists would have to be a lot better than the SEALs in order to win, since better makes them even.

I hope you are understanding my reasoning, because this is my main reasoning behind the entire argument of the SEAL advantage. According to weapon 'fairness', if both teams are perfectly equal skill wise, the SEALs should win. Of course this is only basic probability, and not actually tested.