Impeach?

[The mOBSCENE]

Originally Posted by EAsTon

So after the American people elect him to two terms in office we want him impeached. Everyone acts like he's the worst president we've ever had in our countries history.

But as many others have said this poll is useless. He's 2nd term is up in 5 months or so. He hasn't done anything illegal (that we know of) so might as well just let him stay in office until Nov. 3rd comes.

The American people have been wanting an impeach for the longest time now but we can't do anything about it. It's the House of Representatives that waited until now.

[MenstrualGravy]

Someone is trying to make a name for themselves. I know Bush has a reputation for being an idiot. Think about this Bush knew from the begining he would never be impeached. He made sure of that when he appointed Cheney as his Vice. What would be the point in impeaching Bush when all that would happen is Cheney and Halliburton would take over. Just my opinion

[bigmike8119]

Originally Posted by The mOBSCENE

The American people have been wanting an impeach for the longest time now but we can't do anything about it. It's the House of Representatives that waited until now.

Speak for yourself... I can admit that Bush hasn't been the best president in history, but I can say that under his administration, my family has prospered much more then before. You can ask old timers like my mother. Back in the 70's my mom was bring home so much more money then she did in 90's under democratic rule (Clinton's - extreme taxation policies). We get taxed far less under a republican president. Under democratic rule they give out food stamps and other government handouts like its crack cocaine. It's not the governments job to hand feed people. And were does all this money for the handouts come from. The people, middle class that can't afford to pay for an anchor baby's diapers. It's like paying someone to come and spit in your food every morning. All these hand outs don't work and cost to much to maintain... What happen to, giving a person a fish will feed then one day, but teaching them to fish will feed them for a life time.

[The mOBSCENE]

Originally Posted by bigmike8119

Speak for yourself... I can admit that Bush hasn't been the best president in history, but I can say that under his administration, my family has prospered much more then before. You can ask old timers like my mother. Back in the 70's my mom was bring home so much more money then she did in 90's under democratic rule (Clinton's - extreme taxation policies). We get taxed far less under a republican president. Under democratic rule they give out food stamps and other government handouts like its crack cocaine. It's not the governments job to hand feed people. And were does all this money for the handouts come from. The people, middle class that can't afford to pay for an anchor baby's diapers. It's like paying someone to come and spit in your food every morning. All these hand outs don't work and cost to much to maintain... What happen to, giving a person a fish will feed then one day, but teaching them to fish will feed them for a life time.

Just because your family has prospered more than before from his presidency doesn't make him a good president at all. He still screwed over a lot of other people and helped destroy gas prices.

At one point he didn't even know gas prices were at $4 a gallon because he doesn't care. He has his money and he never has to pay for gas.

[MenstrualGravy]

You are right Mike. I dont like Bush at all but i do tend to be conservative. I guess all the people who are voting for the left want more government agencies telling them what to do. Liberals are really good at spending tons of money on "causes" that "benefit" the people. I think people need to account for themselves and stop expecting the government to bail them out. Sorry Katrina victoms its not my responsibility to pay taxes so you can rebuild your house in a hurricane zone.

[bigmike8119]

Originally Posted by The mOBSCENE

Just because your family has prospered more than before from his presidency doesn't make him a good president at all. He still screwed over a lot of other people and helped destroy gas prices.

At one point he didn't even know gas prices were at $4 a gallon because he doesn't care. He has his money and he never has to pay for gas.

Oh NO! As stated in another thread:

Originally Posted by bigmike8119

Why do you people thank that it's the presidents fault that oil prices are so high. The reason that oil prices are outrageous right now is because of supply and demand. China and India are using so much oil right now that the USA and many other countries can't get the supplies that we once had. All the president and congress can do is put embargoes on countries that can supply us oil. If you guys are so pissed about then why don't you do something about it. Go out and buy a cheap moped or if you can ride transit more. Blaming the president for this is just a escape from not intelligently thanking about the situation and finding a solution for yourselves. And as I've seen more of the so called poor folks drive cars worth more then there houses. And sucks more gas then an airliner. And that is another conversation for another day.

You listen to what extreme left wing tells you on the news and you want here the whole story.

EDIT: If you so fixed on Bush destroying gas prices. Find on legitimate source saying that he has caused gas prices to sky rocket. Also make sure it's a natural source as well.

[The mOBSCENE]

I said he helped, I didn't say he's the main cause.

[OME6A]

Originally Posted by MenstrualGravy

Sorry Katrina victoms its not my responsibility to pay taxes so you can rebuild your house in a hurricane zone.

That's one of the most insensitive things I've ever seen on here. By your logic, no one should live in any of the southern, mid-western (tornados) and western (wildfires) parts of the country.

[The mOBSCENE]

Originally Posted by OME6A

That's one of the most insensitive things I've ever seen on here. By your logic, no one should live in any of the southern, mid-western (tornados) and western (wildfires) parts of the country.

What he's saying is that anyone living in hurricane/tornado zones KNOW they are at risk by being there and it's there choice to live there and he shouldn't have to pay more because of it. I don't think it's insensitive, a little low but that's his opinion.

[bigmike8119]

Originally Posted by OME6A

That's one of the most insensitive things I've ever seen on here. By your logic, no one should live in any of the southern, mid-western (tornados) and western (wildfires) parts of the country.

I can agree with this. It's all of our jobs to help another person out when something like that happens. In my past posts I was referring to people that take handouts and have no intention of help themselves. Grants for College is a great handout for people of the age to use it. I wish they wouldn't limit it to were people with a some money, but not enough to afford a good school can get one like the poor can.

Originally Posted by The mOBSCENE

I said he helped, I didn't say he's the main cause.

And how has he helped?

Originally Posted by The mOBSCENE

What he's saying is that anyone living in hurricane/tornado zones KNOW they are at risk by being there and it's there choice to live there and he shouldn't have to pay more because of it. I don't think it's insensitive at all. A little low, but he has a point.

And this why we have flood and hurricane insurance with our home insurance policies.