How Many Shots Until You Kill the *?

discombobulate · 07-28-2005

Well, you are all morons. Every last one of you.

mHsBlind, as I said before, if you can't read Caprice's, you are an idiot.

Deathmonger, it is patheic, not tedious. Just pathetic.

For the oxfordfreestyl guy, I wasn't flaming him. I was pointing out the obvious, and explaining why it is unnecessary, and a total waste of time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wand3rer

The idea of the title is that when people go "how many shots do I have to put into this motherf**ker's [body part]?" You can look at this chart and go "oh okay it takes # shots."

Yeah, I'll just politely ask the guy I'm in a gunfight with to hang on a second so I can go look at some chart, that'll go over great. And may I once again point out that if you are wondering "How many shots do I have to put in this guys shin!?!?" you should probably be practicing your aim, not finding out how to kill people in an un-orthodox way. (As in shooting them in the shin)

Deathmonger · 07-28-2005

How is it pathetic when he said he had lots of fun doing it? Nothing wrong when you take a gun and shoot them and count, of course that may be far too difficult for you to do because it takes a certain level of education to actually count as high as 15.
Stop being an immature little prick and if you can't say well good job, then don't post anything you rude little bîtch.

My guess is that you're probably about 15 years old because of how you acknowledge other people on here, my advice is grow up you and actually regard people as if you were actually speaking to them, because guaranteed you wouldn't say that crap to their face because you would get your *** kicked.

The entire gun list was just for reference and we all had a basic idea how how many shots each gun ttook to kill you but not exactly. I never knew it took 15 shots i in the shin to kill someone or that the damage rate was actually variable, that suprised me.

discombobulate · 07-28-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deathmonger

Stop being an immature little prick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deathmonger

my advice is grow up

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deathmonger

because guaranteed you wouldn't say that crap to their face because you would get your <font color="#FF0000">*censored*</font> kicked.

Just wanted to put those three together.

I think we can see I'm not the only one being immature here. You are saying that in reality, wanderer would beat me up, or maybe that you would. Either way, that is the dumbest comment I have seen on here in awhile. Thus, I don't even want to waste more time responding to your post. If you think along those lines, you are obviously a waste of time.

For future reference.....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deathmonger

if you can't say well good job, then don't post anything you rude little bîtch.

I'll post what I want whenever I want. I'm not going to listen to someone like you that resorts to talking about violence over a forum.

Deathmonger · 07-28-2005

You wouldn't call any of these people morons in real life if you saw them would you? Why don't you actually have respect for them as you would when actually speaking to them? I said grow up because you call other people morons, idiots and think yourself yo be at a higher level of intelligence for some odd reason when you're probably i still in middle school.
I don't insult others simply because the reasons you do, little pricks like you need your *** kicked. Dorks sitting behind the computer your mommy bought you. How about you stop acting so childish and just post without the insults. Or otherwise post how you would talk to somebody.

Deathmonger · 07-28-2005

You wouldn't call any of these people morons in real life if you saw them would you? Why don't you actually have respect for them as you would when actually speaking to them? I said grow up because you call other people morons, idiots and think yourself yo be at a higher level of intelligence for some odd reason when you're probably i still in middle school.
I don't insult others simply because the reasons you do, little pricks like you need your *** kicked. Dorks sitting behind the computer your mommy bought you. How about you stop acting so childish and just post without the insults. Or otherwise post how you would talk to somebody.

And since I state the obvious that makes me immature? You name call, kids in elementary school still do that, there's a difference from stating the obvious and simply name calling. You jsut called every person on this thread a moron, which is quite childish.
You what just forget this crap, trying to stop a 15 yr old nerd talking smack on the internet is a lost cause, I'm gonna go shoot some pool.

discombobulate · 07-28-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deathmonger

You wouldn't call any of these people morons in real life if you saw them would you? Why don't you actually have respect for them as you would when actually speaking to them? I said grow up because you call other people morons, idiots and think yourself yo be at a higher level of intelligence for some odd reason when you're probably i still in middle school.
I don't insult others simply because the reasons you do, little pricks like you need your <font color="#FF0000">*censored*</font> kicked. Dorks sitting behind the computer your mommy bought you. How about you stop acting so childish and just post without the insults. Or otherwise post how you would talk to somebody.

May I once again throw back what you say yourself? You are doing exactly what you are criticizing me for, which makes you a hypocrite. I wouldn't have respect for these people when actually speaking to them, therefore, do not have respect for them on a forum. I do not think I am at a higher level of intellignce. Some people are morons, so I will address them as a moron. If you can't handle it, too bad. Ignore me. I am not in Middle School, since you seem to be so obsessed with guessing my age, which you still haven't done correctly. You call me childish, yet call me a "dork" and try and make fun of me because of my age, which you don't even know. That makes you look dumb, because you are assuming so much, when you actually know nothing about me. You assume I am 15, in Middle School, and that my mother bought my computer, none of which are correct.

In reality, this had nothing to do with you, you stuck your nose into it, and told me to "Go **** myself" and started it all. You could have easily handled it in a mature way, yet didn't. I'm going to be the one that steps up and ends it.

I'm done, gg.

Wait, he made a double post. I'm still not 15, you really should stop making your assumptions, as I have already said, they make you look foolish.

Wand3rer · 07-29-2005

Yo - one thing you can learn from this experiment:

Since the STG takes 3 shots everywhere to kill (but the head),

Quote:

Originally Posted by experiment

"STG 77 3 3 3 3 3 3 1"

You should fire it in bursts (like an M16's rythym) to get a kill (provided all 3 shots hit). The STG 77 doesn't have burst mode though, so you'll have to train yourself to doit. This should save you time and allow you to lessen yourself up on your recoil.

Btw, could the mods please delete discombobulate's unfounded arguments and anything posted in response to it? Nobody wants to read it and nobody cares. Thanks.

OTTER · 07-29-2005

When 2 guys are sitting there shooting 1 shot slowly at eachother, from what I've learned, it takes more health away than when you put 3 or 4 into him simultaneously. So, 3 shots with the STG, if you go and unload on a guys leg, he won't die. 3 shots will not kill him in the leg in a room with other people shooting and nades going off etc.

chronic313 · 07-29-2005

nice but the 12g takes 1 shot in the chest

Wand3rer · 07-29-2005

It won't deal as much damage simultaneously because the game doesn't register that many hits so fast - It may register 1 or 2, but not all 3 (sometimes I guess).

When you're in the firefight though, 3 hits with the STG77 anywhere will knock 'em out for you. Like 1 hit every now and then as you duck&weave or whatever.