552,more better than iw80?
 |
|
01-24-2005
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Calif.
Posts: 1,201
|
I forgot to put SD on the last 552. He only used the 552SD in the games I was in. Hope that helps.
|
|
|
01-24-2005
|
#12
|
|
Moderator
|
The 552 is an incredible gun, what is wrong with you people? just because it doesn't fire 4023875987349068 shots per second does not make it a bad gun.  It has a bad a55 recoil to it but you can use it to your advantage with the headshot capabilities.  I love using this gun in games where people talk sh!t about the 552. I just simply tell them that I will show them how it works
|
|
|
01-24-2005
|
#13
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 145
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Angus Y
OMFG SHUT UP with the IW n00b crap alright. The gun is one of the best in the game so people are going to use it!
|
Why try and start an argument with this guy? 99% of his post is about the 552, and how he thinks that it is good. 1% mentions something about the I-Dub.
Although I don't use the 552, I would think that it would be an alright gun to use. I mean, Zipper put it as the default gun for the Terrorists. It can't be that bad.
|
|
|
01-25-2005
|
#14
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: My House
Posts: 5,340
|
I laughed and laughed when I read this topic. There is no way the IW owns I don't know why it just does. The 552 is weak and slow. The 552SD is great when hidden but when in a fire fight its not the best gun because its not as powerful or quick like the M4A1SD is. I never use the 552 only the 552SD. If I had to choose the worst terrorist weapon it would be 9mm not 552.
__________________
|
|
|
01-26-2005
|
#15
|
|
Moderator
|
Re: 552,more better than iw80?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HA'//KINS
now, this is really funny in fact cause i know everyone out there knows and thinks the 552 is the biggest piece of <font color="#FF0000">*censored*</font> in SOCOM.But i think your wrong,552 is increadibly accurate,POWERFUL and recoil is amazing.You just never took the time to play with it and find its hidden abilities.
Example i was in fish hook,T,and i was facing these iw80 noobs and funnny part was that at close range the 552 ripped there heads apart,i think i overprevailed every gun on the seals amory,with a SIG 552.
now this is gun has no recoil,or barely any,the slow rate of fire is amazing
.it is just amazing what you can do with a gun that you barely know the capabilities,other than just assuming and hearing.
|
maybe you lag well enough that it doesnt matter what you use
__________________
5' 10" 180lbs Bench Press: 5x5 @ 255 (11/9/08 ) Dead Lifts: 3x8 @ 250 Lateral Raise: 8 reps at 45lbs GOW2: Can't get passed level 34 on Horde (2.0 difficulty) or level 18 (Insane difficulty)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OME6A
Of course, in typical American fashion, I have no solution to suggest but have no problem pointing out the problem as I see it.
|
|
|
|
02-04-2005
|
#16
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: knoxville,tennessee
Posts: 3
|
Re: 552,more better than iw80?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HA'//KINS
now, this is really funny in fact cause i know everyone out there knows and thinks the 552 is the biggest piece of <font color="#FF0000">*censored*</font> in SOCOM.But i think your wrong,552 is increadibly accurate,POWERFUL and recoil is amazing.You just never took the time to play with it and find its hidden abilities.
Example i was in fish hook,T,and i was facing these iw80 noobs and funnny part was that at close range the 552 ripped there heads apart,i think i overprevailed every gun on the seals amory,with a SIG 552.
now this is gun has no recoil,or barely any,the slow rate of fire is amazing
.it is just amazing what you can do with a gun that you barely know the capabilities,other than just assuming and hearing.
|
Now that i see what yall are saying about this socalled 552, i may have to try it out..see what all the fuss is about
__________________
Respect is not givin, Its earned!
|
|
|
02-04-2005
|
#17
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 152
|
dude your wrong
|
|
|
02-10-2005
|
#18
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Maryland/United States
Posts: 24
|
i may be wrong(i most likely am) but i like the dd2sd better than the 4alsd cuz i think it is more silenced and only a little weaker than the 4alsd
__________________
|
|
|
02-10-2005
|
#19
|
|
Banned
|
HAWKINS, more better than grammar?
I'd go with the 552, because nobody uses the IW anymore sarcasm
|
|
|
02-21-2005
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Huron, SD-USA
Age: 17
Posts: 1,034
|
DOWN RIGHT NOO!!!!!! IW WOULD OWN THE 552. BUT IT MATTERS THE PERSON. SO THATS JUST MY OPINION
__________________
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
M4a1 or idub?
|
idubkiller |
Polls |
10 |
08-16-2006 02:23 AM |
552,more better than iw80?
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 AM.