| Call of Duty 7 -
Full Member
They should have just stopped after Modern Warfare was released. -
Why are so many people hating on COD? I think its a great game for all consoles. One of my favorites actually. Its such an addictive game and i hope they DONT stop making the series. -
Full Member
We all know that Treyarch are full of crap and not even at par with the standards of IW. Cod5 was ok and can be on the A list of games but MW was really the gem of Call of Duty Series to date. Even with MW2, I'm getting skeptical they are going to f**** up this time with too much additions *but don't take my word for it, we'll see about it when it gets released.
The people to blame for this is activision by making 2 developers and thus making all these ruckus, it'd be better if they (trey) make a separate game other than COD. -
meh...
Call of Duty 7?
they sure aren't wasting any time... -
Full Member
Good lord. Give us a break for a bit, and then we'll be ready for 7.
Horrid timing. -
Full Member
Is the CoD series becoming one of those "enough sequels already" franchise? Besides Modern Warfare, does anyone care?
It's like Neversoft having their 83rd Guitar Hero release this year, enough already we get it!
All we have is who we are... -
Full Member
It's like the damn Saw movies they never stop coming but in the case of Call of Duty I don't really mind. Best FPS ever produced keep them coming!!! -
Well it doesn't sound too bad when you think about it... It's like the GTA series, they stop numbering for a while. It went GTA1,2,3, VC, SA, 4.
Now it's COD1,2,3,4,W@W,MW2,7 -
Graphics Staff
 Originally Posted by Z3CH Well it doesn't sound too bad when you think about it... It's like the GTA series, they stop numbering for a while. It went GTA1,2,3, VC, SA, 4.
Now it's COD1,2,3,4,W@W,MW2,7 That's not the same at all. GTA continued the count from the last numbered game. COD didn't. Runnin' shit in northern Afghaniland -
 Originally Posted by Scuba Steve That's not the same at all. GTA continued the count from the last numbered game. COD didn't. True... I think MW and MW2 (and possibly W@W) should only count as 1 number because they are the same thing with new guns and such and obviously W@W was just a different time period. So this should be CoD 5 -
Graphics Staff
 Originally Posted by Z3CH True... I think MW and MW2 (and possibly W@W) should only count as 1 number because they are the same thing with new guns and such and obviously W@W was just a different time period. So this should be CoD 5 So do I because the previous two were not numbered. It only makes sense. Runnin' shit in northern Afghaniland -
Full Member
wow....i can't believe this... Shadow of the Night  -
Wow, they really are popping these games out constantly. Way too fast for us users, but I guess if your in the business of making money the faster the better.
They just better not lose quality thats all I have to say! -
 Originally Posted by warrior skunk Wow, they really are popping these games out constantly. Way too fast for us users, but I guess if your in the business of making money the faster the better.
They just better not lose quality thats all I have to say! I think they're going at a good pace. Just because they started working on it doesn't mean it'll be out for another 2 years or so. Games take a long time to make, and they have to let MW2 run its course. -
Graphics Staff
 Originally Posted by Z3CH I think they're going at a good pace. Just because they started working on it doesn't mean it'll be out for another 2 years or so. Games take a long time to make, and they have to let MW2 run its course. Agreed. Besides, I doubt the quality of COD games will ever decrease. It may get old to the public, though, but by no means worsen. Runnin' shit in northern Afghaniland | |