Video Game Forums

Go Back   Video Game Forums > Miscellaneous > Archives

Archives This is where all the old threads will be stored for future reference.


More Brutal?
Poll: Which sport is more brutal?
Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.
Poll Options
Which sport is more brutal?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2005   #1
Senior Member
 
breath of life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Morgan Hill, C.A
Age: 19
Posts: 1,470

Send a message via AIM to breath of life Send a message via Yahoo to breath of life
More Brutal?
Well I was reading a few posts and I noticed that we have some dissagreements about which sport is more brutal, Hockey or Football. So I decided to use this moment of bore-dumb (lol) and make a poll about.

Actually give some reasons to why ou think which is wich.





My vote, I Pick Hockey. The reason I say this;

Hockey players play about 4 games a week compared to the one a week of football (thats not inluding the "Bi-week")
Hockey players wear little or no padding (not including goalies,for obvious reasons), where football players are covered from head to toe.
Hockey players have a 2 pund puck (I think, dont know real weight) flying at their face/bodies at 80+mph, football players have a 1/2 pound ball of air.
There is normally 1-2 fights in a hockey game, so the players are always watching their and their teammates backs. I have yet to have seen a fight in football, thats not counting the fat lineman puching eachother.
When a hockeyplayer messes up, he HAS to work as hard as he can to go chase the guy. Most football players just stop and watch.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Teh mOBSCENE
Teh m0BSCENE (10:47:56 PM): im a f a g x2 then
breath of life is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2005   #2
Moderator
 
The mOBSCENE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland Sex-Position: Reverse Peace Sign
Age: 21
Posts: 9,559
Xbox 360 ID : The m0BSCENE

Send a message via AIM to The mOBSCENE Send a message via Yahoo to The mOBSCENE Send a message via Skype™ to The mOBSCENE
Re: More Brutal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by breath of life
Hockey players play about 4 games a week compared to the one a week of football (thats not inluding the "Bi-week")
That is because Football is more of a contact sport.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Breath of Life
Hockey players wear little or no padding (not including goalies,for obvious reasons), where football players are covered from head to toe.
I have played both sports and they wear about the same amount of padding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Breath of Life
Hockey players have a 2 pund puck (I think, don't know real weight) flying at their face/bodies at 80+mph, football players have a 1/2 pound ball of air.
The puck doesnt normaly fly at their face. football players have 250lb linebackers ready to tackle them. wide recievers have to worry about catching a ball blind and being punished by a safety running up right into them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Breath of Life
There is normally 1-2 fights in a hockey game, so the players are always watching their and their teammates backs. I have yet to have seen a fight in football, thats not counting the fat lineman puching eachother
There are fights in football but they are actualy broken up. in hockey they are not. all of the blind hits take place of the lack of fights and you dont watch enough football to see any fights.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Breath of Life
When a hockeyplayer messes up, he HAS to work as hard as he can to go chase the guy. Most football players just stop and watch
Football players do not stop and watch, they always chase them down. if a player just stops, they are normaly cut the next day.



Now, as you can see, i obviously voted for Football. as i previously said before, there are many blind shots and 250lb linebackers flying at you. the hits are always bigger. in hockey, it may be constent but most of the hits are little bumps into one another or just holding someone against the boards. I am not saying this because i like football more, i am saying this because this is how i see it.
__________________

MGS4... Perfect ending for a perfect game!
The mOBSCENE is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2005   #3
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 902

Quote:
in hockey, it may be constent but most of the hits are little bumps into one another or just holding someone against the boards
Maybe in a girls league. But in my devision there are always Big hits. I play hockey and I guess I am voting on the fact that the league I play in is very rough. There are some big kids that play hockey. Hell I play this one team I swear the kid must of been 256 265 easy. oh well. He hit like a bull.

But I can see at times how football can be just as rough. But i still think hockey has it's edge.
Morpheus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2005   #4
Senior Member
 
Angus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hicktown, USA
Age: 17
Posts: 2,749

Send a message via AIM to Angus Send a message via Yahoo to Angus
It is football. Beacuse there is a lot more hitting in it. A lot of hard hits.
__________________
Angus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2005   #5
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 902

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angus Y
It is football. Beacuse there is a lot more hitting in it. A lot of hard hits.
Again I would have to disagree...(waht else is new) I really wish you could come and watch one of my games. Then you would change your mind.
Morpheus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2005   #6
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: k-town/ac~dub
Posts: 343

Send a message via AIM to [shadow]ghost
Well I myself have never played hockey but I do play football. I also play rugby. So IMO rugby is more "brutal" than football. I don't know which is more brutal between football and hockey but I don't think you could say either one is the most brutal sport.
[shadow]ghost is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2005   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: WeeeeWoooo's Throne
Posts: 3,531

Send a message via AIM to Tiger
Definately Football.

Like mob said, ever seen those o lineman, all they do is run and hit 350lb dlineman, and vice versa.

Runningback is the hardest player of football. These guys take hits eveyplay, usually are piled on.

If hockey was as brutal as football, thered only be one game a week
Tiger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2005   #8
Graphics Staff
 
Scuba Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California, USA Requests: 161
Posts: 7,352
PS3 ID : Parkway-D

Sure, those fat *** lineman clock in at 300, but you actually think they can be flying at you at an easy 20 mph? Look at the largest players in hockey.

Take Pronger, for example. Easily 6'10, possibly 7'0. He weighs easily 250, and is flying around the ice like it's nothing.

Football's hits are all for show, rarely some gets hurt, and it's mostly because they landed on their leg weird, or some fat *** fell on it.

Football players don't need padding, the players they're being "hit" by are the same weight as them, so they don't need all the padding they have.

In hockey, you can be hit any second on the ice, you can be speared, high-sticked, anything.

To say hockey is a weaker sport than football is crazy.

Also, football players only play 16 games a year. Hockey teams will double that in a matter of two weeks.

Another fact, the football players aren't on the field the entire game.

You have your special teams this, your special teams that. Wait, here come the offense lines...
__________________
Scuba Steve is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2005   #9
Moderator
 
The mOBSCENE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland Sex-Position: Reverse Peace Sign
Age: 21
Posts: 9,559
Xbox 360 ID : The m0BSCENE

Send a message via AIM to The mOBSCENE Send a message via Yahoo to The mOBSCENE Send a message via Skype™ to The mOBSCENE
What about linebackers that weight in between 250 and 325lbs and can run nearly as fast as cornerbacks? (Ray Lewis, Brian Urlacher, LaVar Arrington, Derrick Brooks)

I would LOVE to see you take a hit from one of these guys. Football is all about hits. Hockey, as I said above, are little love taps and holds against the boards most of the time. You dont see too many hits or rough shots.
__________________

MGS4... Perfect ending for a perfect game!
The mOBSCENE is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2005   #10
Graphics Staff
 
Scuba Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California, USA Requests: 161
Posts: 7,352
PS3 ID : Parkway-D

I would take on one of those fat asses any time. Just because they're fat, doesn't mean they can run fast.

Breath is right, when the ball goes down field, the linebackers (is that what they're called? I'd rather refer to them as a "fat ***") just stop and watch. They, by no means, chase the guy with the ball down.

Every game I've watched (and yes, I've seen a lot of games), the fat bodies (FMJ rules!) just shove each other, like even larger sumo fat bodies.

Hockey has love taps? What sort of hockey have you been watching?

Apparently, nothing serious.
__________________
Scuba Steve is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

More Brutal?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO