...it's not right.

[fatstarr]

ok so i been researching 'Ghostbusters the Videogame' coming to the PS3/Xbox360/Wii/Ps2/Ds/ and im dissapointed.

the PS3/360 versions of the game Look soo Beautiful its like watching the movie and it starts from 'Ghostbusters II btw'. So the game is Hot.

i look further and to my shock i see the wii/ps2 version
its horrible it looks like a polished N64 game Compared to THe 360/ps3 ver.

im just angry that the innovation that could have came from this is going to be ruined on the wii. Crossing the streams on the wii wont look good with the wii graphics.

like i would be a lil bit more happy if it had Xbox Graphics Or even Resident Evil 4 graphics but now my hopes for Ghostbusters is low on the wii ...

[mortal flame]

Wow.

Really??

Well thats defiently going to be a down fall for the wii.

I don't uderstand that myself either. Just because its Nintando does not mean it has to look dull.


That really is a dissapointment.

[Pvt.Dirt]

Originally Posted by fatstarr

ok so i been researching 'Ghostbusters the Videogame' coming to the PS3/Xbox360/Wii/Ps2/Ds/ and im dissapointed.

the PS3/360 versions of the game Look soo Beautiful its like watching the movie and it starts from 'Ghostbusters II btw'. So the game is Hot.

i look further and to my shock i see the wii/ps2 version
its horrible it looks like a polished N64 game Compared to THe 360/ps3 ver.

im just angry that the innovation that could have came from this is going to be ruined on the wii. Crossing the streams on the wii wont look good with the wii graphics.

like i would be a lil bit more happy if it had Xbox Graphics Or even Resident Evil 4 graphics but now my hopes for Ghostbusters is low on the wii ...

You must remember that Nintendo's goal with the Wii was not based on only graphics. I imagine there are a couple cool twists in this game for the Wii version that will make it better than you may think.

[awesomethrash]

I haven't read anything about the new ghostbusters, honestly i didn't even know they were making a game, but if you're looking for a good wii game you should go with super mario galaxy. It's awesome... Or if you're just looking for a game with ghosts a good classic is Luigi's Mansion, you could even play it on your wii...

[mortal flame]

I haven't read anything about the new ghostbusters, honestly i didn't even know they were making a game, but if you're looking for a good wii game you should go with super mario galaxy. It's awesome... Or if you're just looking for a game with ghosts a good classic is Luigi's Mansion, you could even play it on your wii...

Well he is convinced that a may be a good Wii game but he is refering to the graphics which look poor for the Wii version.


Its true that the Wii may offer alot more features in the game but if you are a big person on graphics then this might not be good then.

[TheDemonHunter]

In reality the look of the game does matter. This was a big turn off for me on the WII. While I appreciate innovation, I couldnt care less for gimmicks.

Nintendo, if you wish to "innovate" fine....but up the bar at least a little on graphics. If you had, id have a WII in my living room right now.

[Negative Creep]

Originally Posted by Pvt.Dirt

You must remember that Nintendo's goal with the Wii was not based on only graphics. I imagine there are a couple cool twists in this game for the Wii version that will make it better than you may think.

Agreed 100%... I'd be willing to bet that this will be the case for the Wii's version of the game.

[The_Doodler]

Originally Posted by Negative Creep

Agreed 100%... I'd be willing to bet that this will be the case for the Wii's version of the game.

Nintendo's goal wasnt to neglect graphics either, was it? if not, lets just go back straight to atari or NES again..... lmao jk, but yes, theyre going backwards not forward.



why cant companies pull out something visually decent, say XBOX like. xbox 1 games look kickass for what they had back then. i bet the Wii Hardware has the specs for at least that.


look at SOCOM 2. it looked allright, and even if i play it in this day and age, it still looks visually appealing and acceptable.

why cant they do that. what about conker BFD in the N64, that console wasnt the best at graphs but they pulled out conker. lets not talk about Conker remake for xbox. it looked pretty next gen to me. and its not.


MErcenaries or Destroy all humans/Battlefront1. all from Pandemic studios. the PS2 version of those games looked and will still look GOOD.they do the job. not next gen but GOOD.



if theyre not making graphically good games, instead of better technical graphic developers, they should hire ARTISTIC graph developers.




how comes they managed to pull out visually good games with last gen graphs, and now they cant even reach the same ammount of success in the wii (wich is a bit better than GC and maybe at xbox 1 level or something). they forgot how to do that or what.

theres no excuse.

[FazeD]

It can't be any worse than Ghostbusters (NES) that game was a piece of crap

Check out Angry Video Game Nerd's Review (Explict Language may be NSFW)
Gametrailers.com - ScrewAttack - Angry Video Game Nerd: Ghostbusters (NES)

[jmoran1097]

why are some people surprised that the Wii is/was going to be a graphic failure?